It's spelled "sure".

I repeat: Would you care to cite a source that proves your claim 'IE - which does actually have a better security track record these days'? Probably not.

Go away troll (or MS shill).

For track records, see Secunia. Be sore to compare like-for-like, won't you? Probably not.

And as it's been more than 24 hours, you can also move on to the next FireBadger bug:

http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1724569/mozilla-fixes-firefox-update

The shambles continues... Evidently.

Funny how you bash Firefox.

Would you care to cite a source that proves your claim 'IE - which does actually have a better security track record these days'?

Go away troll (or MS shill).

PS it's spelled 'fanbois'.

Funny how you FireBadger Fanboys refuse to accept that very same argument when it's offered in defence of IE - which does actually have a better security track record these days, yet still gets bashed more than FirePheasant...

"In fact, it's worse than IE has been in recent years and is as safe as driving in a Morris Minor in Iraq."

So fixing bugs in the software makes the software less secure? Oh PLEASE bestow us with more of your great wisdom Einstein :/

What a pile of old junk.

This thing is years old and was sold as being all about security. In fact, it's worse than IE has been in recent years and is as safe as driving in a Morris Minor in Iraq.

Was there ever such a triumph of marketing noise over coding substance?

Wake up people.