The Inquirer-Home
Comments
waste of money

selling shoddy disfunctional merchandise eh?

i dont suppose MS will be refunding monies to the sad mugs who paid for it though!...

its extortion and criminal

posted by : fiery jack, 21 July 2010 Complain about this comment
@TheShatnerMan

I'm afraid your ignorance about this is a rather overwhelming. There have already been targeted attacks and SANS have raised their Infocon level to yellow on this.

http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=9190

This has nothing to do with putting icons onto desktops. Merely browsing a USB stick, CD or (potentially worst of all) remote shares with explorer can trigger this exploit as far as I can see.

As for your comments on Linux - they seem even less well informed.

posted by : Keith, 20 July 2010 Complain about this comment
Correction 2.0

@ Bubba: The last line of the article should be corrected to say: "It's probably best to use a machine that's running an OS used by the minority of users."

Ever fish? If so, you'd know you DON'T tell everyone where your best fishing hole is; surfers don't tell the tourists where the best waves are.

Please stop telling th esheeple to use Linux, or it will grow in popularity and then we will all get hacked to hell.

posted by : mike, 19 July 2010 Complain about this comment
Lot of Noise About Nothing

Linux? Seriously? Anyone who can suggest linux as a primary desktop environment needs something better to do with their time than penguin snowboarding. The real reason Linux has no exploits is nothing of value runs on it. What would they steal? Your anime collection?

Researchers showed off a "proof of concept" exploit. You know what that means? Theoretically it might be possible, but in reality it's probably never happened and will likely be fixed before it does.

The truth here is people should be smart enough not to run applications that put malicious icons on their desktop in the first place. I know it's harder to secure your system properly than it is to install Linux, but I'd much rather have all my software run native than through some bugged up emulation system.

posted by : TheShatnerMan, 19 July 2010 Complain about this comment
Proof of concept?

Shortcut-based viruses are spreading for ages. I guess virus writers even see them as old-fashioned nowadays.

Linux, with all its stupid flaws, lack of games, no proper office apps, and hours of googling and micromanaging, is still worth the trouble (and free).

posted by : mycelo, 19 July 2010 Complain about this comment
Heh, heh. Start your week with a registry hack.

Say goodbye to your icons. Heh, heh. -- Oh, I guess this one is relatively easy to fix, but it's *so* characteristically M$ that a basic desktop item has severe flaw.

(2nd attempt.)

posted by : bigger_luddite, 19 July 2010 Complain about this comment
Heh, heh. Start your week with a registry hack.

Say goodbye to your icons. Heh, heh. -- Oh, I guess this one is relatively easy to fix, but it's *so* characteristically M$ that a basic desktop item has severe flaw.

posted by : bigger_luddite, 19 July 2010 Complain about this comment
Good idea

"In the meantime, it's probably best to view files on USB drives on a machine that's running Linux."

With plenty of live cds around it could be a good idea.

posted by : Koorosh, 19 July 2010 Complain about this comment
Correction

The last line of the article should be corrected to say: "It's probably best to use a machine that's running Linux."

posted by : Bubba, 19 July 2010 Complain about this comment
I love Ubuntu

Does it seem odd the safer operating is free?

posted by : Scott, 19 July 2010 Complain about this comment

Microsoft admits to a widespread Windows security flaw

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?