From Faaborg's blog: "This entry was posted on Thursday, June 24th, 2010 at 12:58 pm". Your article made it seem like he was putting the video out now due to recent critical complaints. This sort of misrepresentation is very disappointing.
Also, right click the navigation bar and deselect "Tabs on top". Voila, they're now on the bottom. That's not too hard is it?
Who cares about tabs on top? The fact that they're horizontal means they're still fundamentally flawed. You can have, what, five or six at a time before they become unreadable?
Vertical tabs are the only reason I even keep using this damn memory-leaking slow Firefox browser instead of Google Chrome. I hate Firefox's caching memory problems. Why doesn't Mozilla concentrate on *that* fundamental aspect (bug) of its browser rather than this worthless tab functionality?
From Faaborg's blog: "This entry was posted on Thursday, June 24th, 2010 at 12:58 pm". Your article made it seem like he was putting the video out now due to recent critical complaints. This sort of misrepresentation is very disappointing.
Also, right click the navigation bar and deselect "Tabs on top". Voila, they're now on the bottom. That's not too hard is it?
They would have done much better, had they included multithreading like all other browsers, instead of some cosmetic facelift of this aging browser.
Who cares about tabs on top? The fact that they're horizontal means they're still fundamentally flawed. You can have, what, five or six at a time before they become unreadable?
Vertical tabs are the only reason I even keep using this damn memory-leaking slow Firefox browser instead of Google Chrome. I hate Firefox's caching memory problems. Why doesn't Mozilla concentrate on *that* fundamental aspect (bug) of its browser rather than this worthless tab functionality?
Isn't fashion arbitrary?