I would be much more interested to know what Seagate did to improve product reliability and internal accountability than to read about some new flashy performance points and cost advantages.
Nobody who is attached to his precious data should trust a new HD line before checking a 6 months in-the-wild actual data.
Catch 'Em with header, Then Slog 'Em Down. O/S?,Combee' Stuff seems to Go Faster than processor. Who Needs Map at 500 Miles per sec. thats 1.8 Mil Miles per hr. Actually Gets there Before user Knows left. Now Thats Journalism, Today. SSD under Left Ear, then Wham HDD In Gut.
Next Flash Makers will admitt Flash Cost Less to manfacture than DDR2,3,& 5. ALL Been Bunk To Rip Pub of Excess Cash. PS Lappee' Fits into Desktop with adapters.
For Just HDD, western Digital has good reviews. yet just Sunday 1TB down to $49. What If Player Is 'Tard Gamer, Think of that, Tomorrow, when find out where ALL Was or Will Be.Could SataIII Do As Well?
I am not pro or contra of any OS, so this is just a comment on comments of some one-sided minds
First, Win 7 is built with such technology in mind, see its spec.
Second, as anyone can expect, this gaming laptop is also for Windows not the OSX or Linux.
And third, it's the harddrive manufacturers who are actually 2-3 years late to the market.
Great they finally started to make them as promised years ago. Now SSDs will start faster drop in price
Always had good results with Western Digital drives but this concept seems pretty cool. My hard drive is the slowest performer in my gaming rig and it is a new WD SATA II drive so this would be cool to bring up the drive performance in 7-64bit game rating.
Like any newly released technology, there's probably some technical shortcoming in Windows that prevents it from being used. The PCtards will blame everyone except Microsoft, where the blame truly lies. Meanwhile, newer, bigger, faster hardware, it's all business as usual for Linux and OSX.
I would be much more interested to know what Seagate did to improve product reliability and internal accountability than to read about some new flashy performance points and cost advantages.
Nobody who is attached to his precious data should trust a new HD line before checking a 6 months in-the-wild actual data.
P.C. Wang ROFL! You guys crack me up!
Catch 'Em with header, Then Slog 'Em Down. O/S?,Combee' Stuff seems to Go Faster than processor. Who Needs Map at 500 Miles per sec. thats 1.8 Mil Miles per hr. Actually Gets there Before user Knows left. Now Thats Journalism, Today. SSD under Left Ear, then Wham HDD In Gut.
Next Flash Makers will admitt Flash Cost Less to manfacture than DDR2,3,& 5. ALL Been Bunk To Rip Pub of Excess Cash. PS Lappee' Fits into Desktop with adapters.
For Just HDD, western Digital has good reviews. yet just Sunday 1TB down to $49. What If Player Is 'Tard Gamer, Think of that, Tomorrow, when find out where ALL Was or Will Be.Could SataIII Do As Well?
drashek
I am not pro or contra of any OS, so this is just a comment on comments of some one-sided minds
First, Win 7 is built with such technology in mind, see its spec.
Second, as anyone can expect, this gaming laptop is also for Windows not the OSX or Linux.
And third, it's the harddrive manufacturers who are actually 2-3 years late to the market.
Great they finally started to make them as promised years ago. Now SSDs will start faster drop in price
Always had good results with Western Digital drives but this concept seems pretty cool. My hard drive is the slowest performer in my gaming rig and it is a new WD SATA II drive so this would be cool to bring up the drive performance in 7-64bit game rating.
And since the decision of whether to store given blocks in SSD or HD is done entirely within the drive, it's completely OS-independent.
I want one.
Like any newly released technology, there's probably some technical shortcoming in Windows that prevents it from being used. The PCtards will blame everyone except Microsoft, where the blame truly lies. Meanwhile, newer, bigger, faster hardware, it's all business as usual for Linux and OSX.