The Inquirer-Home
Comments
@ xerox

Why did they wait till now to spring this? If they have been watching and waiting till they could make the most money off of this (which would not be out of Xerox' nature) then I hope this gets thrown out and Xerox made to pay any legals incurred on it!

posted by : andrew, 24 February 2010 Complain about this comment
Toner, not Ink

Toner, not ink...

http://www.xerox.com/go/xrx/template/inv_rel_newsroom.jsp?app=Newsroom&ed_name=NR_2008Nov18_Ultra_Low_Melt_EA_Toner&format=article&view=newsrelease&Xcntry=USA&Xlang=en_US

posted by : Antoine Dubuc, 24 February 2010 Complain about this comment
@ you guys

@ Mitchell - that might be what Xerox is hoping for!

@luddite - yes, they can. Basically, everything a computer does, 'could' be done manually. Heck, people can even patent roses!

posted by : mike, 24 February 2010 Complain about this comment
First, a pox on all their houses.

But just because you've computerized a process that could be done manually, doesn't mean it's patentable, let alone enforceable in court.

In the old days, advertisements simply put a code such as "Dept. PE" into mail address to indicate which publication had brought it in.

The overarching plague is of moneyed interests who turn patent and court systems into a profit center. That's what happens when you let *money* become the *sole* pursuit. We're losing *civil* society because that pursuit funds itself, and has bought traitorous politicians to remove all effective limits on incomes.

posted by : bigger_luddite, 24 February 2010 Complain about this comment
Just buy Xerox

Microsoft buys Xerox. Game Over. Microsoft has more cash on hand than Xerox's worth.

posted by : Mitchell, 24 February 2010 Complain about this comment

Xerox beats its chest at Google and Yahoo

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?