The Inquirer-Home
Comments
Lets not forget

Hello all I think many of us may be forgetting the point of this card and why it could be a big deal for home theater buffs. 1st all pc’s are normally the last to get reasonable price technology when it comes to A/V stuff. What the writer may have failed to mention is that this card can decode all the HD surround formats natively…for less than 100.00!! Do we remember the 249.99 priced ASUS Xonar HDAV1.3 24-bit 192KHz PCI Express x1 that still sells for 249.99 by the way. I think this is a good thing for hometheater pc buffs.

posted by : Mrbig1225, 06 February 2010 Complain about this comment
Cheap 128 SP Fermi? Laugh.

"just hope that $50 Fermi will be 2x or 3x or event 5x better than HD 54xx. I hope Nvidia will do the same 512 SP for hi end, 256 SP mainstream, 128 SP for low end."

If 512 SP Fermi is 500mm^2, then a 128 SP Fermi would be over 125mm^2 - especially as some functions are fixed size, so probably closer to 200mm^2. That's just not doable for a sub-$100 graphics card.

A 64-SP Fermi is probably the best option you'll get, and it'll be late this year. Or NVIDIA will wait until 28nm.

posted by : JeeBee, 05 February 2010 Complain about this comment
@Mike

YEAS

XBMC FTW

Simple, free, great interface/GUI in general, and does good streaming.

Runs on my little hardware accelerated box, all nice all quiet, and streams off my server downstairs.

If I wanted to replace such a system, I'd probably go for a little ITX box with one of these in it.

With HD video, and audio over HDMI(?), this is not a bad little investment for a new system.

Simple, cheap, and quiet as a sponge.

posted by : Splinter, 05 February 2010 Complain about this comment
54xx as 56xx are suck

I like Radeon 58xx because it is normal 2x HD 48xx. I like HD 57xx because it is 2x HD 47xx or about the same as HD 48xx. I hate 56xx because it is <= 46xx. I also hate 54xx because it is <= 44xx. The golden rule should be performace 1600 SP, mainstream about 800 SP, low end about 400 SP. So far only hi end and mainstream play the rule. Low end is just 20% below what it should be. I just hope that $50 Fermi will be 2x or 3x or event 5x better than HD 54xx. I hope Nvidia will do the same 512 SP for hi end, 256 SP mainstream, 128 SP for low end.

posted by : Hok, 04 February 2010 Complain about this comment
5450 Lower Price & 5470, 5650

First, Really Do NOT encourage HD Game Cards, Often Perofrmance is HALF of Non HD. Its, Rube Name, Of Sorts, ye Coman As Snarks.

Heres 5450 Lower Price : From Hummm, something just as reliable as gooseing IT For HD, eboy:

MSI Radeon HD 5450 512MB 64-bit GDDR3 new R5450-MD512H

Item condition: New



Quantity: 2 available
Please enter a quantity of $quantity$ or less
Please enter a quantity of 1

Price: US $53.99

So Maybe More In OK Zone with HD @ 20% discount, Two More Cards Coming from ati, 9fed & one In February. Nifty, Well, $130 Is Bit Much, theres Still Those $100 XX70 Cards About. Heck if Dx11 Isn't Hufff, In 4000 series AVIVO Is In software, So Maybe Just As Good, If You downlaod AVIVO, As Its' on Bottom of ATI Driver page & Seperate Add on. Is 4870 At same $$$ As 5450 Better? YA Bet Cha....There 5X30 For $40, Too, Somewhere in SideBar Ads, Not in ?Search, SideBar Ads Are In Braile,?Right.

posted by : nomee', 04 February 2010 Complain about this comment
Re: XBMC

VDPAU* ~much~

There are like a half dozen (or so), Distro's out there that cater to just that.

Gen2VDR-3.0
yaVDR
EasyVDR
C't VDR

Or you can try an' roll'n your own.

To clarify;

XBMC - Multimedia Playback Software w/RSS and limited on-line fuctions

VDR - Video Disk Recorder **Requires** a DVB-x (C - Cable, S(2) - Sat. or T - Terrestrial) Card. You can (or could with version 1.7.0 Pause and rewind live TV (it's been broken since ~I think~ 1.7.4 (current dev vers is 1.7.11) Current Stable is 1.6.0 but, does not support HD or h.264.

It used to be that you needed a so-called Full Feature Card to use VDR (FF for short) what that meant was that you needed a Hardware MPEG-2 Decoder to use it. Thankfully these Dinosaurs are slowly being left behind now. With the general trend towards nVidias' VDPAU and the XBMC.

VDPAU =/= nVidia GF8400 (or better)

posted by : Anonymous, 04 February 2010 Complain about this comment
XBMC!!!

As much as I like Windows Media Center I wish that someone from ATI or NVIDIA would work with the people at XBMC so they could leverage the GPU in XBMC.

Would be a huge purchasing decision for me if something other than a broadcom chip did GPU acceleration in XBMC.

posted by : Mike, 04 February 2010 Complain about this comment
sorry I forgot to clarify

"Naaaa I didn't think so either, so I fail to see where you are coming from. 'Cause there is no way that failure from Microsoft could ever be taken seriously."

I was of course referring to Media Center (I leave it to the Reader to determine which ever version, that they care to imagine). Fact is they are all sh!te

posted by : Anonymous, 04 February 2010 Complain about this comment
HTPC GPU of the Year is it?

Then does this mean that ATI have finally got 'round to making some Hardware Accelerated (i.e. h.264), Drivers for Linux then?

Naaaa I didn't think so either, so I fail to see where you are coming from. 'Cause there is no way that failure from Microsoft could ever be taken seriously.

NO DVB-C
NO DVB-S
NO DVB-S2 (h.264)
NO Common Interface
ONLY DVB-T!! (And ONLY FTA at that!)

Yeah, gee no wonder why I went for the Penguin (In this case Gen2VDR), to address these "omissions" that Microsoft continuously fails to address.

Personally, I'd give the HTPC of the Year Award to the Green Goblin, at least they gave us VDPAU.

But, then I personally couldn't give a toss between ATI or nVidia. I use a Reel Extension HD Card in my HTPC System and I find that, that does the job quite nicely...

posted by : Anonymous, 04 February 2010 Complain about this comment

AMD lets loose its HD 5450

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?