The Inquirer-Home
Comments
LOL@Hector. I hope that your forehead will be stamped with Intel Inside logo.

Do you agree Intel must subsidize its competitor, AMD? Well, at least Dirk Meyer had been employed at Intel.

I hope that Intel will crush the rats in ARM based architecture vendors. I don't want to see them, because I want everyone to be implanted with Intel's chips and become smarter to choose Intel Inside as Intel can control what people will think.

posted by : Maddoctor, 02 February 2010 Complain about this comment
@Educate Yourself

no, you educate yourself.

What "legal rulings" are you talking about?

There was no legal ruling in the EU, according to the EC. If you remember, they claim that their findings are "not a legal matter" but an "administrative decision" in their explanation as to why Intel doesn't have the right to have the case heard in a court, and why they should be able to not meet standards of evidence.

There has been no "legal ruling" from the FTC either; they don't get to do that, it has to go to a court.

In fact, none of this has ever made it in front of a court, anywhere in the world, and so far we haven't seen anything that is required to pass standards of evidence in any jurisdiction.

posted by : anon, 02 February 2010 Complain about this comment
@Hector in denial

Hector, please see the FTC rulings and EU rulings and the AMD settlement rulings on Intel's convictions for multiple violations of anti-trust laws over the past 15 years. If you don't have a clue, maybe you can get a monkey to explain the legal decisions to you.

posted by : Educate Yourself, 01 February 2010 Complain about this comment
@Intel needs to get nailed

"they will continue to violate anti-trust laws"

Remind me again how they're violating anti-trust laws ? It can't be because they have a process lead of at a least a year and have produced the best processors for most of the 40 years since they invented the microprocessor. It's called competition and if any competitor falls behind just a bit, it's really hard to catch up.

posted by : Hector, 01 February 2010 Complain about this comment
Intel needs to get nailed

Until Intel gets nailed with a $500 Billion - that's with a "B" fine, they will continue to violate anti-trust laws for profit. Why wouldn't they when they make huge profits from violation of law?

posted by : Jon, 01 February 2010 Complain about this comment
Well,

I just hope they look a the BILLIONS of dollars our economy lost when E6300 dropped the bottom out while Q6600 made sure it would stay out.

Market leaders can't manipulate prices so the smaller competition can't afford it.

Isn't that a Standard Oil tactic?

posted by : BaronMatrix, 01 February 2010 Complain about this comment
Ouch!!!

Well, I guess that's what happens when you can't play fair with others from day one!

posted by : Arlington, 01 February 2010 Complain about this comment

US FTC smacks down Intel

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?