Why does Scott owe any "respect" to a corporation who, having bought a bunch of software patents and having shaken down Sun and other companies, now hawks licences for them while claiming that they're the fount of digital imaging innovation?

Is the 360000 in mike360000 a Kodak fan club membership number or a for-hire astroturfing bureau's employee number? Sheesh! You can't even counter the guy's point about Kodak's products.

Well if Motorola paid for Kodak's ip so should these 2. Ain't it interesting how snarky that large corporations fight consumers and small companies off for infringement like Psystar but yet do it themselves undeniably and unshamefully.

Mr. Scott,
If that is all you can print, then you mite as well retire, because you already know it all! You totally show a lack of respect and judgment, just flaming away belittling something you nothing about and doesn't seem you want to learn either.. Just go away...

"Kodak has a long history of digital imaging innovation . . ." What total bull malarky that statement is. If they have such a long history of innovation, why are Kodak digital cameras total cr@p? They missed the digital revolution, and are now trying to make themselves seem relevant again.

Unbelievable!