The Inquirer-Home
Comments
For what?!?

All this talk about net neutrality for what...there are some companies now that distribute software that seems to solve the solution...

New version of uTorrent ... uses less traffic... although this version is still in beta...

ZapShares ... CNet's download.com gave them a positive review...stops files from being shared...stop the files from being shared...= no uploading...= less throttling...or not need to throttle

PeerBlock ... controls who your comp is talking to...reduces the amount of traffic and need to throttle...

The point is that there are solutions now out there that fix the problem. The FCC should stay out of this!

posted by : silversurfer200, 12 January 2010 Complain about this comment
@Jason Goatcher

Oh hell yeah!!!

posted by : Doug Glass, 12 January 2010 Complain about this comment
Awesome, next, can we sic the judges on the IRS?

Probably won't ever happen, but the 16th Amendment looks like doublespeak to me(I'm referring to the book 1984, not sure if I have the right word), so it would be nice if the judges did something about this so-called mandatory social security and income tax.

If the Constitution forbids directly taxing a citizen, and the 16th Amendment doesn't contradict that(and it doesn't if you make a grammatical analysis of all the pertinent stuff) then WHY do people go to jail for not paying their income tax? Slavery is illegal, so why is peonage practiced in the US of A?

posted by : Jason Goatcher, 11 January 2010 Complain about this comment

Judges question FCC authority

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?