The Inquirer-Home
Comments
Where are the ARM netbooks?

Good effort from Intel an all, but I'd like to see a comparison of an ARM Cortex-A9 and these latest Atoms. Where are the ARM Netbooks that have been promised for so long?

posted by : Neil, 21 December 2009 Complain about this comment
unreasonable platform limits

Where's USB3?

I've been watching 1080p off the Internet since I got a 30Mbps cable link.

No h264 decode and USB3 in inexcusable.

I feel sorry for the Intel engineers who put this one together.

posted by : Will, 21 December 2009 Complain about this comment
This should be yesteryears news.

If Intel didn't have a stranglehold/monopoly on the PC chip market where it constantly pushed bigger and more expensive chips we would've seen processors like the Atom awhile ago. Most people don't need 50 billion cores running at 100 gigahertz, they just want to surf the web and send email. I'm glad the recession forced market pressures on Intel and the people are finally getting what they've wanted all along, cheap computers that do what they need and not expensive computers that do more.

posted by : Ken, 21 December 2009 Complain about this comment
After some research...

I've found that the PACKAGE is 60% smaller because there are two chips now instead of 3. And a bit lower power consumption from one of the new atoms, I'm guessing due to binning because they both have the same cache.

posted by : mike, 21 December 2009 Complain about this comment
Some more info, please

The article does not say if the 'smaller' atom is a result of a smaller process or architecture re-design.

I assume the other two new, lower-cost atoms are not part of the 'smaller' lineup because the single-core draws 10 Watts. But mabye the higher draw is because is has more cache than the 5.5-Watt device - the article doesn't say.

Overall this article gives us some nice apples-to-nothing bits of info. :)

posted by : mike, 21 December 2009 Complain about this comment
just enough

I think we wil look back on the whole atom product in ten years and indentify it as a key turning point for personal computing and possibly electronics as a whole. 'just enough' performance is the order of the day on a planet ever more obsessed with energy consumption.

Human prior technology obsessions stem from the idea: 'more is ALWAYS better'. More features, more functions. Atom is a superb representation of the impending and NECESSARY change in consumerism.

Just enough for the job, is always enough. A fact everyone should remember.

posted by : VP, 21 December 2009 Complain about this comment
Intel Makes PRESS Release....

Atom, So Tableto. then InBox took ATOM Hit. As Creator of Millions, Nay perhaps Billions of Atomites, I Thomas Stewart do Declare ALL Atoms, MINE.(Especially HEAVY Ones). Oh,Well. Heres Press release.

http://www.intel.com/pressroom/archive/releases/20091221comp_sm.htm

I could C&P Intel email, yet its just too long.

drashek

posted by : theOriginalATOM...., 21 December 2009 Complain about this comment
Atom does impress me

The only thing Intel has done in the last few years that actually impresses me.
Speed has not improved that much compared to years past but I really like what they have done with the Atom, it has opened up a whole new world of small form factor and low power consumption.

posted by : Scott, 21 December 2009 Complain about this comment

Intel releases smaller Atom chips

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?