The Inquirer-Home
Comments
Racetrack memory

The future of RAM.

http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/23859.wss

posted by : Mike, 01 December 2009 Complain about this comment
ha!

its called stringing the piggies along for years before anything remotely similar to whats being promised. screw gddr3 im waiting for 5 or 6 ^ ^.gddr 3 prices have fallen too quickly wink* wink*

posted by : super dude, 01 December 2009 Complain about this comment
Piffle.... mere baby steps

So where is all this great, non-volatile ultrafast memory we've been promised for years? Seems to me that would cut the power budget a bit if done right.

posted by : rich wargo, 30 November 2009 Complain about this comment
@ "..don't quote me"

Jason Goatcher said "Of course, that's assuming we get something called DDR5 at all. I've heard ruminations that we may move on to something else entirely. Haven't really researched it though, so don't quote me".

Seriously, that was one of the most unintentionally funny posts I've read in quite some time. Actual out loud laughing. Cheers.

posted by : satis-factual, 30 November 2009 Complain about this comment
gddr != ddr

@memory hungry. GDDR isn't the same as DDR. The problems with GDDR4 won't affect DDR4 at all.

posted by : bw, 30 November 2009 Complain about this comment
have to agree

i'd never considered memory to be any factor in system power usage, until recently. 4 sticks of ddr3 that i installed on my am3 mb were getting just as hot as my video card. had to shell some $ for a dedicated memory module fan. chips are not overclocked beyond manufacturer specks (i think that i actually run them lower but with tight timings)

posted by : joed, 30 November 2009 Complain about this comment
Learn the lingo

The first memory went at a certain speed(I forget what) DDR(Double data rate) goes at twice that speed. DDR2, doubled again, DDR3, doubled a third time. 2^3 or 8. Are you beginning to see a pattern here? DDR5 is, wait for it...32 times as fast as the stuff we started with.

Of course, that's assuming we get something called DDR5 at all. I've heard ruminations that we may move on to something else entirely. Haven't really researched it though, so don't quote me.

posted by : Jason Goatcher, 30 November 2009 Complain about this comment
Cut Power by Doubling Bit Width....

Another Drashek WaterMellon Pie? NO.

Today Elphedria Samples Hit for NEW DDR2 with 32 bit. twice old & less power,now. although at DDR2 voltages. Past was 16 bit & used assemble/disassemble that took two lines in & Out for 16bitx2. Now whole shebangun does it all in one simple 32bit step.

sample shipments of a 2-gigabit x32-bit I/O DDR2 SDRAM that operates up to a high speed of 1066 Mbps. The new memory device is capable of meeting the need for 1.8V x32-bit

posted by : Memorite, 30 November 2009 Complain about this comment
Why DDR4?

Why not just skip DDR4 directly to DDR5? Everyone knows that DDR4 didn't show any improvement over DDR3, it was shortly available in graphic cards market before it was dumped completely (just in some high end ATI cards).
DDR2 was not necessarily as well, but at least it brought a significant frequency boost.

posted by : Memory Hungry, 30 November 2009 Complain about this comment

More RAM for less power is forecast in 2010

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?