..Therefore I shall hold out for my eSATA IV Razor F@t@l1ty mouse, thank you very much. (Which I'll adapt down to PS/2, cause I kick it old/new school)

The pictures are awful therefore should be left offline. What is the point of showing something blurry? It was probably taken with a Blackberry or some sort of similar device. If you need pictures to be taken, you can always ask me. Photography is like IT; you need some skills.
Cheerio folks

"I'll still stick with PS/2 keyboard and mouse input for now"

Good luck with that. They're disappearing from motherboards -- you'll need a USB adapter. A lot of boards are down to one PS/2 port already.

...does this mean, at the moment at least, if you want two graphics cards (or a dual GPU graphics card), some USB3 and SATA 6GBps devices, then you're better off doing down the AMD route?

Okay, I realise, anyone who wants USB3 and SATA 6GBps devices will probably have enough cash to stump up for an X58 board and matching CPU anyway.

Does make me wonder though who has the customers best interests in mind, AMD or Intel?

Rob

I could see some high end gaming mice going USB3 soon. If USB3 allows a higher polling rate or higher resolution then definitely. Anything that produces a perceived advantage can pretty easily be marketed to gamers.

boards?, they have direct connection to chipset, so no pcie switches

Saturation Is Nebs Point & Point of Day, so Heres bit more. Back in time before My Juice Break, Total Channels where limited to 2. it'd be one, except then only be on, 2 gives you off ,1 & 2.

So In FREE Flight Controllers, you'd get rudder, neut, left or right & elevator, neut, up or down. full Tact, No Inbetweens, Except with Gltching. Glitching is sending too many signals at once, Overvolt, which passes thru resistor & gives Ghost 3rd Position(engine). then restores its self ready for 1 or 2.blipblip blopblip dit blip blop dot blipblipblip dit dot dit.ALL AM, NO FM.(Morning UpDate: Now i bm,ha,ha,ha,heeee.)

With USB3, problem is so many components want part of action that each unit data rate slows to crawl,Dat of Slowest Device, so much for memory device into it.

Sata3 Awaits SSD, 220 SSD Octos' cranked out terrabyte of Data per second few days ago, so its possible.

Heres Final Point, None of that mechanical good stuff has much further to go. SSD Can take more channels, faster into more spaces than anything here to for invented, since yesteryears.

Buffalo Snuck Sata2 into usb3 platform,twodaysago, both saturation is compromised by other devices on USB SuperSpeed brought down to: that don't glitch & performance is compromised by mere Lower sataII potential, yet it takes steps & baby steps at that, so buffalo develope newness at todays rate.

When Will They Learn. Take SSD octo tS position, Ram it into SataIII, gibit fifie channels & walla, ten gb/s Data thruPut from ONE SSD.

ask drashek time is brought to theINQ Readers by consortium of Governments.

If your photography skill amounts to producing blurry images, perhaps it's time to admit you shouldn't be taking them yourself.

Unless this is some sort of a unique E.T. sighting, a blurry motherboard image should really be left offline.

Blah blah fsckn blah... We know all this stuff! WTF is the info on Power Over eSATA that is supposed 2 have been finalized for the latest 6Gbs SATA standard? This is the single most important detail in the world of external native buss hi performance storage.