It would be nice to see the figures with integrated graphics and a solid state HDD, and also integrated graphics and a 'reasonably fast' (i.e. SATA3, 7200 rpm rather than a 5400 rpm) HDD. Those numbers would give a better idea how a power-saving but functional box for use as a server or folder would perform. We could all look up the estimated power consumption of a solid state HDD, but why invite people to read other sites for the info you are lacking?
In other words, your 'low end' (no HDD) test is a bit too low (8 cores with no storage) and your high end (with a discreet GPU) is a bit too high.
Would you be so kind to run the Cinebench test on this machine (preferably on Windows 7 x64 or Vista x64) and publish the results?
Thanks in advance.
Tagline: "An 8-core DP box under 100 watts"
It would be nice to see the figures with integrated graphics and a solid state HDD, and also integrated graphics and a 'reasonably fast' (i.e. SATA3, 7200 rpm rather than a 5400 rpm) HDD. Those numbers would give a better idea how a power-saving but functional box for use as a server or folder would perform. We could all look up the estimated power consumption of a solid state HDD, but why invite people to read other sites for the info you are lacking?
In other words, your 'low end' (no HDD) test is a bit too low (8 cores with no storage) and your high end (with a discreet GPU) is a bit too high.