Why does the article "AMD is a big winner in the supercomputer race" from earlier today say "AMD is doing quite well in the supercomputer league tables with four of the five top systems running on its chips."
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1562211/amd-winner-supercomputer-race
While this article "Intel pushes supercomputing " says
"Chipzilla is claiming a victory in numbers, with around four out of five supercomputers on the full list powered by its chips."
Which is correct?
(AMD holds the very top spot and dominates the top five spots in the list, while Intel powers 80 per cent of the supercomputers in the full Top500 list - Ed)
when I got in an argument with someone because they couldn't understand how women could comprise most of the best AND worst drivers on the road.
Statistics, fun stuff.
Btw, not sure if I'm right about the women, it's just my opinion, no actual statistics involved. :)
It's because 4 out of the top 5 use AMD CPUs or GPUs, but 80% of the Top 500 use Intel CPUs
- so both correct...
Why does the article "AMD is a big winner in the supercomputer race" from earlier today say "AMD is doing quite well in the supercomputer league tables with four of the five top systems running on its chips."
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1562211/amd-winner-supercomputer-race
While this article "Intel pushes supercomputing " says
"Chipzilla is claiming a victory in numbers, with around four out of five supercomputers on the full list powered by its chips."
Which is correct?
(AMD holds the very top spot and dominates the top five spots in the list, while Intel powers 80 per cent of the supercomputers in the full Top500 list - Ed)