These two posts are absolutely spot on.

who exactly is it in the EU and UK that wants to take way and refuse our right to to assumed innocence until proven guilty....

and more so, how exactly does this PR UK news announcement effect the European Parliament obliged to get a shift on with reform

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/22/telecoms_package/

and who exactly are these people
that refuse to ratify the EU directive.

"
"No restriction may be imposed on the fundamental rights and freedoms of end users without a prior ruling by the judicial authorities … save when public security is threatened," said the amendment.
....
"

please NAME those EU Parliament and Council representatives refusing to ratify the directive to our right to assumed innocence until proven guilty....

and please supply and direct us all to the EU freedom of information act data as relates to these prior AND coming meetings and related data, and provide a full news report timeline etc.....

any other site on the internet.

They are like highwaymen who, now that so many people know where they are and are bypassing them, want the Government to legislate that all travellers are to pass their way.

The record labels weren't happy with just ripping off artists. Now they want the government in all Countries to chase the ppl who figured out how to rip them off.
With everyone's tax money. Not everyone downloads movies and music. In fact it's a very small percentage of the population, but they think every tax payer should foot the bill to save their failing business model.