It amazes me how many recovery scenarios occur without a recent, tested, backup. Hitachi may have said it would work but they didn't pull the trigger. The engineers must have been pissed because then they get to clean up while Balmer talks smack.

James, unfortunately, the avg person doesn't know that and he is trying to convince everyday people it wasn't M$'s fault; not people that actually have a clue.

I'm quite sure it will never happen at all - to me anyway. I'll never trust a cloud with my data.
Not unless I have my own backup, that is.

"They reportedly had a backup from a couple of months ago" - Can can you believe this? Their standard practice was to only backup every couple of months.

Never, Ever, trust the Vole with your data. Who cares if this isn't technically their cloud system. If a system containing customer data is allowed to run for MONTHS without backup then something must be very rotten in the management of Microsoft.

And how about the whole having to delete the last backup before a new one can be started? Sure it's all on a redundant SAN, but I think they've just proven yet again that redundancy is not backup. DON'T TRUST THEM, EVER. It's just too big a company and the management too rotten - eventually some of the internal groups will start cutting corners again and this will happen again.

Yet another decision made by those who know the cost of everything, and the value of nothing.

To be honest, backups are not given the priority they should be, because people have been lulled into a false sense of security, thinking that everything "just works", especially upper or project management staff.

Many companies were burned in the 80s and 90s because of failure to back up their data, and it would seem that memories are very short - because these lessons are, it seems, still being learned by today's management.

Dear Steve,

You just need to look at 2 names on the danger team:Mark Fisher and Jamie Rosenberg

Keep them away from windows mobile. Check out their bios on linkedin.

There are several articles on this item that blame 'Cloud' computing. Based on what we now know about the back-end infrastructure, Sun HW and Oracle SW, blaming Cloud computing is a little disingenuous. The infrastructure was traditional and the failure was violating standard backup best practices. Microsoft should have moved this over to Azure but the SW was probably not ready for distributed architectures.

The real issue is not Cloud. The issue is not following best practices or internal processes.

LOL if I had the time to bother, I'd search for .Mac coverage on Inq and compare/contrast Nick's coverage with this.. .Mac was bad but this was far, inexcusably worse, but I bet the vitriol and snark about .Mac was typically insufferably dopey.

Nick is a tool, useful only for driving Mac fanboy pageviews. If inq had an author-ignore feature he'd be my only entry :p

(Frankly, with Mike, Charlie and Fudo gone, why do I even keep coming back? Habit I suppose :p)

"Ballmer single-handledly rescues Sidekick users' data!" (paraphrasing the New York Times).

I love the statment about the auto recovering Oracle database. Im an Oracle DBA(among other things) and this simply is not true. The Vole can't even admit the admin tried to recover the databsae. How silly just admit you F$%ked up.

Jip, good thing it was not the evil apple company!

Jip, good thing it was not the evil apple company!

Microsoft continues to behave like a Vole. Don't admit anything. Try hard to blame it on someone else.

I'm counting all the excuses Microsoft has used about the data loss debacle:

1. Blamed it on the Sun hardware and Oracle database, claiming the debacle happened because "it was not Microsoft technology".

2. Blamed it on a company called Danger, which Vole ate 18 months before. How long does it take before Microsoft takes responsibility?

3. Blame Hitachi. What a great excuse: "The Hitachi guy told us that back-ups are for wimps, and not needed. We believed him."

4. Blame T-Mobile customers' wacky imaagination. Now Ballmer disputes there was ever a data loss at all. That's akin to saying the T-Mobile customers just imagined there was a data loss.

If Microsoft doesn't think it was its own fault, how will it ever ensure it doesn't happen again? It doesn't instil much confidence in Microsoft's Azure cloud service if it doesn't admit to cock-ups. And who in their right mind would use the Windows Mobile 'MyPhone' back-up service? (Who in their right mind would use Windows Mobile at all?)

The Vole needs to come clean before it can earn our trust.

Even in being critical of the Almighty Vole Nick shows his bias one can only imagine if Apple had lost this data what Nick's tirade would have been like.