The Inquirer-Home
Comments
NO THANKS

I'm sick of Google's broken and beta code. Even their search engine's delete results system is broken (not to mention useless). Google needs to earn back its reputation of making quality products rather than adopting Microsoft's policy of having their hands in every last niche, no matter how half-baked the outcome.

posted by : BB, 24 September 2009 Complain about this comment
How are you gentlemen?

All your browser are belong to us

posted by : CATS, 24 September 2009 Complain about this comment
All that glitters ain't Chrome plated

For me, developing IBM Cognos BI reports, Chrome nor FF can render the prompt select boxes in the right place. They both left-justify all screen objects. I have had improved performance installing Foxit Reader for PDF rendering. The Inquirer's pop-over flash Ads forced me to disable shockwave. At least when rendering reports in xml and html, IE appears to be the only reliable solution.

Bottom line: it has to work correctly for whatever reason. Backwards compatability cannot be chucked like bathwater with baby.

I applaud Google's efforts. Since Cognos is now IBM, perhaps, perhaps, perhaps...

posted by : Foxit Reader, 23 September 2009 Complain about this comment
Chairs exiting Windows

Were you able to hear the chairs crashing through the office windows in Redmond??

posted by : Sam, 23 September 2009 Complain about this comment
Chipped Chrome

Are Google doing a Microsoft and starting to dumb down their normally smart decisions? Maybe regretting their bizarre decision to a) create their own browser when they had a great success already in Firefox and b) basing it on the awful Safari engine??

posted by : James, 23 September 2009 Complain about this comment
Danger!! Don't install!

Downloaded and ran it... Oh dear Blue Screen crash...avoid it like the plague!!!

posted by : Gart, 23 September 2009 Complain about this comment
Webkit?

I thought only the browser in Android-based mobiles was based on Webkit? Is Chromium based on Webkit too?

posted by : M.P., 23 September 2009 Complain about this comment
interesting...

I'm not sure if I think this is a good thing or not, but it's interesting. Perhaps for IE6 users, but most people using IE6 probably can't install activex controls or any applications for that matter, so it's probably useless. As a jab at microsoft it's funny though.

posted by : Andrew, 23 September 2009 Complain about this comment
Sounds like fun...

Combine that with IEtab, and Firefox is your ultimate web rendering test platform!

posted by : Steve, 23 September 2009 Complain about this comment
Bad Reporting

"All pages opened with Internet Exploder are then rendered with Chrome's WebKit-based engine."

Only websites that include "<meta " will be rendered with the plugin.

posted by : Birkoff, 23 September 2009 Complain about this comment
No Ta

I for one won't be touching this. All my data for search AND additional browsing tied to 1 vendor, no thanks. One on the reasons I use Firefox but not IE, and use Google butwon't use Bing! on my home PC's.

posted by : fussyoldgit, 23 September 2009 Complain about this comment
Don't do it

Tried it out and it killed my computer twice in the last few hours. I had to do a hard reboot each time because the computer was completly frozen by this google rubbish

posted by : John, 23 September 2009 Complain about this comment
Why not...

just use chrome?

posted by : Billy G, 23 September 2009 Complain about this comment

Google hacks IE

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?