The Inquirer-Home
Comments
Duh

Wow it is interesting to see that Intel claims that the EU didn't prove what Intel says they didn't do, but would stop doing to comply with the ruling. If Intel would only stop doing all of what they aren't doing, they wouldn't be in violation of the EU laws.

HB

posted by : Hucklebuck, 19 September 2009 Complain about this comment
They are shooting themselves in the foot

The EU is not the US where complete domination seems to be a good thing, i think Intel will only get slapped harder with this appeal.

Im a Intel user myself and i dont plan on changing platform anytime soon by all the cash i dished out, but i kinda hope they will get a bigger slap for being this stupid and not accepting the little slap, because they got a very little slap!
EU could restrict Intel's market and do all kinds of nasty things, they are playing with fire.

Pay up and move on tbh, dont push it..
Will be interesting to see what happens

posted by : ..., 17 September 2009 Complain about this comment
Erroneous strategy

The child intel stomps it's feet telling the teacher he did not analyse properly, did not fully understand & is generally ignorant and thus wrong.

I cannot see how this will help intel, sounds like it's angry that it got caught with a hand in the cookie jar.

Just a thought.

posted by : Someone Special, 16 September 2009 Complain about this comment
INTEL Developers Forum & Geetting there While staying Home....

Every wonder how pundits get to All Cool Shows, they don't ,they attend over internet. With ONE Correspondent for Group, whom lives in State.

Heres You Own Links to upComing Intel Developers forum:

http://www.facebook.com/home.php#/IntelDeveloperForum?ref=nf

As Good First Start, then move out into Intel itself:

www.intel.com/idf/communities

Where You Can link With reps from World wide, China to London, bangalore to Edina, Its EveryWhere Meeting & YOU'RE INVITED!!!.

DRASHEK of INTEL.

posted by : Intel Lover...., 16 September 2009 Complain about this comment
@ Intel Lover

Way to go - i think both Intel and AMD fanboys hated your post :)

Well done!

posted by : Tim, 16 September 2009 Complain about this comment
Intel is right

They did nothing wrong other than violate anti-trust laws. The EU should increase the fine to 500 BILLION Euro so that InHell gets the message. The fine should be paid 80% to AMD and 20% to the EU to continue punishing criminal companies like InHell and Microsucks for their unending violation of law.

posted by : Jorge, 16 September 2009 Complain about this comment
Logical exactitude

Bump...bump.

posted by : Anon, 16 September 2009 Complain about this comment
Intel is right in this case

Intel had not been doing anything wrong. Intel only prevent its customers to do business with AMD because AMD's rubbish and inferior products. Intel didn't harm the consumers because they can take the benefits from Intel's superior and cheaper products. Intel believes with simple choice with Intel's products, consumers can take the advantages from Intel's superior products than competitors products. Intel will win in this litigation. Intel hopes AMD will be aware with its inferior products, so it is logical AMD can not win the deals with the customers. It is AMD own faults so they will be no more.

posted by : Intel Lover, 16 September 2009 Complain about this comment

Intel lodges EU antitrust appeal brief

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?