It should come as no shockwave,_
theinquirer.net that is.

What a day. The sun is out, birds are singing, bees are trying to have sex with them -- as is my understanding ...

I've been a Yahoo! user since the very beginning. They offer a lot of services that could be very helpful and entertaining, but Yahoo! never really perfects anything. They get a good idea, do is half a$$ed and then move on. For example, Yahoo! chat rooms. They were becoming very popular and then the bots moved in and all the users left. Yahoo! never did anything about the bots and now Yahoo! chat rooms are a near ghost town with the exception of millions of bots. Think about it, Yahoo! had a way to get users to sit still at one window for an hour or more. I bet Google wishes they would have something that would keep their users staring at ads for long periods of time. In the long run Yahoo! won't be here unless they start providing services that work well.

I see the point that she is making refering to Yahoo as a news center rather than a search bar with the "whats going on" statement - but she hasn't figured out that there is more to the net than Yahoo and it could be the reason why Google has prospered.

crawl back to hell were ya came from and be google's (long inhale) BI*&!@#$

All you have to do to see the future of Yahoo is look at the disaster Bartz left at Autodesk. Financially, Autodesk looks great, but it was all at the expense of the end user and the product line.

The Bartz philosophy is the destructive one of boosting performance measurement numbers at the expense of everything else, then dumping the company on a rich stupid buyer.