If you get one of the decent models, it's pretty much the ultimate in plug and play. It Just Works. No dropouts. No conflicts with other networks. Just one LAN cable in one adaptor and one in the other. Fantastic!
Having said that the reviewed kit does seem to be pretty shit.
Well, the review of the "Radeon HD 4730" looks like a 4770 really, I thought the 4730 would have a lower clock, and g/ddr2/3 not gddr5. The specs given by the site suggest it's actually a 4770. Editor@TheInq, mind checking the quality of the site before giving it a link? That review was well and truly sub par.
After successful day of testing 785G looked good, then on second day, audio was tested, seemingly simple step. NO.
785G audio tested incapable of anything above 5.1 surrond. although it play S/PDIF out O.K., NOT capable of Higher formats, AT ALL. So Once Again, specs Don't Match Actual Performance.BUMMER.
If you get one of the decent models, it's pretty much the ultimate in plug and play. It Just Works. No dropouts. No conflicts with other networks. Just one LAN cable in one adaptor and one in the other. Fantastic!
Having said that the reviewed kit does seem to be pretty shit.
Well, the review of the "Radeon HD 4730" looks like a 4770 really, I thought the 4730 would have a lower clock, and g/ddr2/3 not gddr5. The specs given by the site suggest it's actually a 4770. Editor@TheInq, mind checking the quality of the site before giving it a link? That review was well and truly sub par.
After successful day of testing 785G looked good, then on second day, audio was tested, seemingly simple step. NO.
785G audio tested incapable of anything above 5.1 surrond. although it play S/PDIF out O.K., NOT capable of Higher formats, AT ALL. So Once Again, specs Don't Match Actual Performance.BUMMER.
vondrashek
Maybe I'm going blind but nowhere in the 4730 review did I see stated the screen resolution for the games tested.