Yes. Yes you can.

Can i poon noobs with something like this?

Don't stop at the top, AMD. Why not make it a 512 or 1024 bit memory bus if it's on chip?

It's a 128 bit memory bus. Where did you learn how to cut and paste Nick? Magee? Was it he?

http://www.amd.com/us/products/embedded/graphics-processors/Pages/ati-radeon-e4690.aspx

Be real, be sober.

other than Linux support being crap (and they just released 9.7 for linux), your whinings are groundless FUD

Drop support? I thought they were branching the older cards to get newer driver versions to not have a ton of legacy code and so they could fix a lot of what's broken in said legacy code without breaking newer drivers.

Perhaps AMD should spend some time on making the ATI drivers work instead of releasing new hardware every few weeks! Catalyst 9.6 wouldn't even recognise some of the supported hardware during the installation, and things are STILL not working with version 9.7. Don't get me started on support for Linux (it's CRAP). And did you notice all those graphics cards that are no longer supported with Catalyst 9.7. When fixing things get to difficult, AMD decides to simply drop support. Fine company.

Well, I enjoyed reading about this news that I'd missed and thank you Nick, for enlightening me; unlike you back-room 'freaks' that seem to read everything that's published (yeah, right?)

I say, STFU! ...and let me read, you know-it-all's

Thank you for your silence!

Love,
Dave xxx

Thank you !

Get a life!

In AMD websites is true that AMD just released new Graphics Card for Professional and Workstation but what Nick Farrel tells us is really an old story.

This story announces the release of the GPU.

The other story introduces the GPU.

Two different 'stories' (press releases) about the same product.

Maybe, Nick Farrel has tired to become the last man standing that solely supplied news to the Inquirer.

I've read this somewhere... oh right here:
http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1184457/amd-beefs-embedded-graphics-offering