You might want to read the article first before you comment. You're comments are not related to its point in any way, shape, form or fashion.

If I was a stock holder of Google I would be unhappy that my CEO has a vested interest in a competing product to succeed. What does that spell for him at Google if a couple of his products competes and yet he works for both of them. How could I trust that he wont get a nudge by other board members to stop making chrome, or android. I think he either needs to resign as CEO or quit at apple so that he doesn't get in a situation like that.

I love it when someone gets so enraged by a headline that they can't even wait read the article before responding. Congratulations on missing the point by so much that the next article had to duck.

Lay off the coffee.

Hopefully section 8 was written in a sensible manner so that it only applies if the companies are both SELLING similar products as opposed to giving them away....

"I doubt it will have anywhere near the refinement & usefulness OSX has, esp. in the heavy-application department"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

That is all.

Um, how is this new Google OS going to kick OS now? Google is being designed for NetBooks first, I doubt it will have anywhere near the refinement & usefulness OSX has, esp. in the heavy-application department.

It will take some time for google to get this product to the same level as OSX. It is not going to kick OSX by any means, not for some time. Stop overhyping this thing already and assuming it will dominate when you know absolutely NOTHING about it.

GApple allicance? And for 2 decades we though the WinTel alliance was the spawn of evil....

... god help us all from the Smug Do-no evilers.