Thanks for clearing-up the ‘Drashek’ procedures at INQ. for me and for the kind words about my explosion.
Sorry to have ranted on a bit Friday evening. I had just settled down with my hot chocolate and slippers to entertain and inform myself after a particularly extreme week at work and then, low and behold, there he was... again! After fighting back the tears of disappointment, sorrow and incredulity; things got a little out-of-hand and I launched into a stifling rage, breaking off most of the keys on my keyboard in the process...
In retrospect, however, I agree with you that Drashek does bring a certain ‘colour’ to the INQ., albeit a nasty shade of brown :o)

Love,
Dave xxx

<whisper He's skynet in the early stages of self-awareness. Piss him off now and he might bear a grudge, when he has control of the nuclear weapons.
</whisper

The INQ does edit out comments signed by Drashek, which is why he now signs his name in the main text body, and makes up a name to call himself in the name field.

Now if all comments with the word Drashek were edited out, then no one would be able to write a post complaining about him.

I don't like his posts either, but it usually only takes me 1/2 sentence or less to recognise his posts and skip down. But I do find the post complaining about him pretty funny, your's in particular was great satire.

He does add colour to the site, even if it's the sort of colour that makes you want to cover your eyes and shout obscenities.