Greenpeace doesn't chase whalers any more, they figured out that the money was coming in whether they tried to wave green-hugs at the whalers or not.

The BBC made a mockery of their so-called "protests".

So yeah, Greenpeace, who cares. They obviously don't.

Linus Torvalds is probably about as green as they get. If you don't have to upgrade your computer, than that cuts down on pollution right there. Compare someone using a P3 with Ubuntu with someone who upgraded their stuff 3-5 times to "keep up with innovation."

who cares about greenpeace.

I'm amazed:

a) how often Greenpeace trot out this arrant twaddle

b) how quickly journos forget what a load of twaddle it is

I bet greenpeace doesnt take into effect how much less power the wii uses then most other electronics. That should give it a huge score right there.

Yup, Greenpeace gives you a crappy score (sometimes 0) if you don't bend to their will and invite them in to take a look around.

Don't have the latest buzzwords and logos on your corporate info page? You must be evil polluters!

The fact that Apple got a relatively high ranking for LYING about many of their products is all you need to know about these rankings.

GreenPeace said the same crap last year. Not because Nintendo is bad for the environment. It's because Nintendo refused to participate, and so was given a score of zero by GreenPeace.

I think this Greenpeace gang did not have any idea about nintendo case. They thing all Japanese product is not environmental friendly but Nokia do what nintendo do that is made their product in China for less environmentally friendly manufacturing conditions but with better environmentally ingredients product.

Nokia may well be all flowers and light as far as Greenpeace are concerned but they don't designing intrusive communication systems for dodgy governments.
Lovely people.....not.

Wii, GC, N64 lasts loooong time, because it is a good manufactured product.

SO blame M$ for doing the 3RL X360.

So Wii is more eco friendly. hehehe