The Inquirer-Home
Comments
@AMD Fanboi

No, Dave is right. Extreme overclocking using LN2, Helium or DICE serves no purpose other than bragging rights and marketing for the respective chip companies. Clocks achieved using any of these temporary methods are so far beyond the thermal designs of the chips that they will never be achieved using conventional cooling. Cooling that can be run 24/7, like watercooling gives a more realistic idea of the maximum clocks that can ever be achieved with a silicon respin.

posted by : G, 28 May 2009 Complain about this comment
@Peter

Extreme overclocking does have a purpose, right off the bat, it shows the flexibility and limitations of a given CPU design and how much room there is to grow provided the cip makers has success reducing power consumption and heat generation...

posted by : AMD Fanboi, 24 May 2009 Complain about this comment
@Dave

was a typo, meant superconductor. Thanks

posted by : Forehead, 22 May 2009 Complain about this comment
@Forehead

Yes silicon is a semiconductor:

http://www16.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=silicon

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_semiconductor_materials

posted by : Dave, 22 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Milspec vs extreme overclocking

There's a very large difference between the two. Normally, when a component is rated with a wide operational range, this is for *continuous use*. The expectation is that the milspec chip can be chucked in a hot tank, in a hot desert, and still work.

Extreme overclocking makes about as much sense as drag racing : it's fun for a short while, but absolutely no use in the real world.

If it keeps people happy, fine, but personally I see it as utterly pointless unless it results in generally usable products or some sort of genuine cost/benefit tradeoff.

posted by : Peter Kay, 22 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Ugh

Well, first off there is an enormous difference between liquid helium and superfluid helium.... helium is a liquid below 4.2k and a superfluid below 2.17k, which may not seem like a lot, but it is. Second silicon is not a semiconductor, it can be turned into a superdonductor i believe if it is doped enough, chip silicon no though. Plenty of applications use liquid HE though, without it being HE-II and crawling up the walls and stuff.

posted by : Forehead, 22 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Chew*

Chew*

posted by : Not Chew, 22 May 2009 Complain about this comment
@ Liquid He?

I doubt it, liquid helium has been used in extreme overclocking attempts for a bit now (I think as far back as '06-'07 at least) and AFAIK it hasn't caused any unexpected issues.

Helium 4 only turns superfluid below –271 °C which it is never likely to reach.

I don't think the chip will start superconducting either. Although some semiconducters can superconduct: Diamond and SiC are examples, I don't think anybody has observed superconductivity in silicon [yet].

posted by : HyperlogiK<, 21 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Heat menace

Amazing stuff really. It's a nice demonstration of how chip performance is heat limited, not electronically limited.

Also, it's a testament to AMD's chip fab process that a Phenom can take such thermal abuse. Just imagine what a strain all those bumps and the underfill are under when the whole thing's cooled to -146! Most milSpec components are -40 to +85, so what's the spec of the Phenom?

I bet an Nvidia chip would just fall to pieces given their current track record.

posted by : bazza, 21 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Thanks, Wikipedia!

"Since 95.6% ethanol and 4.4% water form an azeotrope (meaning that simple distillation cannot remove any of the remaining water), 191-proof spirits are the maximum proof that is available from the distilled beverage industry. As Everclear is a neutral grain spirit, it is relatively low in congeners."

posted by : Jason, 21 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Modified Dewer flask better

I would think a modified Dewer flask would be better than Everclear. The vacuum would significantly reduce the contact by the N2 with the warm outside, except for where it contacted the chip.

Why not toss the whole motherboard into the liquid N2?

I could go into why Everclear is only 190 proof and not 200, but it would take some 'splainin' and I don't feel like it. It's something we went over in my undergraduate chemical engineering education.

The nice thing about going to a college with chemical engineering and chemistry students is that you could always get your hands on pure ethanol for use at parties. Awesomely wicked stuff.

posted by : Rich Wargo, 21 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Not NY

Well, you can't get Everclear in NY. At least not legally. The best I have found is Devil Springs at 160 proof (80%). It works for me, but I am just using it to sterilize wine making equipment. I have accidentally breathed MUCH more than I have drunk.

The Mad Winemaker

posted by : Eno Master, 21 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Liquid He? (start giggling)

Oh, boy, are they going to be surprised when they start using liquid Helium. Assuming they can get enough, it's a superfluid, with damn near zero viscosity and density, which means it will flow upwards, also very slippery. Not to mention insanely cold.

At some point, the chip carrier and substrate is going to shatter, not to mention the silicon itself.

If the chip gets cold enough, it'll go superconducting on them, which will completely screw things up, as common logic circuits are not designed with superconduction in mind.

posted by : Rich Wargo, 21 May 2009 Complain about this comment
Acrylic

I have played with acrylic pipes before and they always shattered on me when I poured a sub zero liquid into them. Maybe they used something stronger, like Polycarbonate instead.

posted by : Dylan, 21 May 2009 Complain about this comment

Everclear, liquid nitrogen and Phenoms make a party

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?