IMHO all this crysis true reason is USA-china economic dependency, so caled Chimerica, and this crysis only end,- then this is over: $ devalvates, or juan revalvates, or whole world will go from global economics to regional ones, USA, 16 years, from clinton or even GWB (the first) are rising their debt, and now they are rising even at much greater speed, if they can`t spend less past 16 years or more, could they do it, in the future,- having much bigger debt, bigger procents to pay ? Ye they can print more $, but it`s tempruary solution, till some limit
and for china, the sky is not clear too, china is bigest winner of global economics and if something changes ... could they move there titanic to adobt to the new situation.
There's a bit of mental weakness in the argument that the US ought to be the last country to complain about Chinese protectionism. While significantly far from a truly open economy, it still has one of the most open economies in the world. And you can concretely measure the effect of this in its still enormous long-standing trade deficit.
IMHO all this crysis true reason is USA-china economic dependency, so caled Chimerica, and this crysis only end,- then this is over: $ devalvates, or juan revalvates, or whole world will go from global economics to regional ones, USA, 16 years, from clinton or even GWB (the first) are rising their debt, and now they are rising even at much greater speed, if they can`t spend less past 16 years or more, could they do it, in the future,- having much bigger debt, bigger procents to pay ? Ye they can print more $, but it`s tempruary solution, till some limit
and for china, the sky is not clear too, china is bigest winner of global economics and if something changes ... could they move there titanic to adobt to the new situation.
ya'll listen up
ya'll better start learning how to
read, write and speak chinese, rap in chinese, order food in chinese, be chinese
chinese dollar chin chin, bling bling
ka peace~~~
The twenty first century belongs only to China. China will take whatever it wants.
"US and Japan" are plural, so you is expected to use the plural for the verb... isn't you?
Sorry, me english poorr....
There's a bit of mental weakness in the argument that the US ought to be the last country to complain about Chinese protectionism. While significantly far from a truly open economy, it still has one of the most open economies in the world. And you can concretely measure the effect of this in its still enormous long-standing trade deficit.