"According to the organisation's report, 75 per cent of these commercial sites (approximately 850 unique domains by the IWF's count) are registered with just 10 domain name registries."

This goes on because the servers are run by the russian mafia. It makes tons of money off kiddy porn. It pays off the very corrupt Russian government so they never get shut down.

When will people realize that discrimination by classifying abuse by age, is stumbling the issue[s]!

Most of the time in courts age is set as a line not to be crossed, it look commendable, but since abuse is abuse, age has become a rite of passage for ABUSERS, after she's or he's 18 or whatever I'll get what I want thing!

I KNOW it's because of the economic ties to the porn industry and advertising that this is occurring.

So who is going to be first to be REALLY SERIOUS about this!?

Staturoty Law Protects Home & Family To Point AnyOne Can Be Kill just By Being There. However, Same Festering Enviorments harbours Some Very UnSavory Schemes, Nowadays. In Public Health, there are specific laws to allow dystruction of UnWanted Children. Its Commonly done, NO Questions Asked. SQUASH, Next.

age Months to 7 Years Prime Target, Before Know What To Do & NoBody Really Knows Them, Ethier. When Finished, Turn Person Over to Social Services & Walla, NEXT.

Vulgaria is Prime source for photos, Mostly from Wentzstein of china. AKA Mr. Smith in Rural Areas. EveryOne Dies In Rube, Except Perpetrators Whom Put On Invisible Show, One That Cann't Be Tracked Back & Found. TS Drashek

Wasn't there a story a while ago about a lawyer (or politician?) in New York state that got the ISP"s to stop access to ALL newsgroups because child porn was being passed through newsgroups.It looks like our freedom of speech has already been affected. I hope that they can get rid of this sick trash but there has to be a better way than censorship.

"promotion of filtering services to prevent accidental access to child sex abuse websites"

How does one accidentally access a child abuse site?
I do not pretend to be a saint, and I am no hypocrite. I visit sites that make goatse.cx look like softcore, yet I have yet to see ONE picture of a child being abused.
One does not accidentally stumble upon a child abuse website. Arguments like this in favor of filtering make the idea even more suspicious.

I applaud the efforts of the IWF to clean the internet of stuff that is really sick, but they are walking a very fine line. I do not want "freedom of speech" on the list of collateral damage victims in this crusade.