the reason they dont want it put on the web is because, any decent attorney can get you off it, and if this attorney does that. and it is streamed world wide. then everyone will know how to get off the charge, lol and streamed worldwide. its then all over for the RIAA
Well there could be 2 reasons why they don't want it to be recorded.
1) This one being the most probable is that any expert in the field of computer forensics would poke huge holes in their data and state the obvious things like spoofing and botnet/malware scenarios.
2) An other possibility is that the arguments used in the case could be ammo for other P2P's to use against RIAA and/or know what is being collected as evidence to "convict" someone so that the P2P's hide their tracks better.
the reason they dont want it put on the web is because, any decent attorney can get you off it, and if this attorney does that. and it is streamed world wide. then everyone will know how to get off the charge, lol and streamed worldwide. its then all over for the RIAA
As He-Man would say.
Looks like the power of the organization is a bit more than expected. Who'd a thunk it?
Stand by thieves, the ax hasn't fallen yet ... but it's on its way down.
then upload it.
Right, so who's gonna sit in court through it all? ;-)
Well there could be 2 reasons why they don't want it to be recorded.
1) This one being the most probable is that any expert in the field of computer forensics would poke huge holes in their data and state the obvious things like spoofing and botnet/malware scenarios.
2) An other possibility is that the arguments used in the case could be ammo for other P2P's to use against RIAA and/or know what is being collected as evidence to "convict" someone so that the P2P's hide their tracks better.
come on, get out of your moralistic freetard suit and get some reading done on the man.
I think all they've done is publicised (INQ, why US spelling with a Z??) the trial to someone like me who didnt know it was going on.
Stupid Ass of America.