Fudzilla should have used cpu description instead of 20 shades of blue-to-green-orange-black, plus a table at the end with each shade and cpu description.
What's wrong with cpu description within the colour of the bar chart? That way we can see immediately which is which.
Not scroll down, remember 1 or 2 colours and cpu's, scroll up and read their results, scroll down for 1 or 2 more colours and cpus, etc etc. What a stupid way to do it.
6 different shades of green, ffs.
Also, when you click on Next at the bottom of the page it takes you to "next article". Not intuitive.
I'm sure it's a worthy article, but data needs to be presented easily if you want people to read reports on 20 cpu configs.
Fudzilla should have used cpu description instead of 20 shades of blue-to-green-orange-black, plus a table at the end with each shade and cpu description.
What's wrong with cpu description within the colour of the bar chart? That way we can see immediately which is which.
Not scroll down, remember 1 or 2 colours and cpu's, scroll up and read their results, scroll down for 1 or 2 more colours and cpus, etc etc. What a stupid way to do it.
6 different shades of green, ffs.
Also, when you click on Next at the bottom of the page it takes you to "next article". Not intuitive.
I'm sure it's a worthy article, but data needs to be presented easily if you want people to read reports on 20 cpu configs.