IBM is no slouch in the process field; they are as good as, perhaps even better than Satan Clara's process tech.

GloFo's technology alliance with IBM, coupled with GF's new APM 3.0 rev is a highly compelling story if you're a vendor looking for state of the art chippery. I would have to call Jensun completely bonkers if he stayed with TSMC any longer than contractually obligated.

People who are saying that should have a look at the benchmark charts around the web, and tell me what is what.
I would have bought two 260 GTX today instead of having two 4870 but I am happy with my setup.

See this is what is wrong with Nvidia - they are desperate beyond desperate for partners and ATI are gracious enough to offer them assistance via a 3rd party...but Nvidia just wont take it up.

Talks with Nvidia are just like talks with North Korea. They do a lot of chest beating to go along with their failed launches and the bare minimum useful products. They don't even realise how small time they are because they are too busy pretending to be bigger than what they are.

We've heard this baloney from AMD before. They have a legacy of over-promising and under-delivery, which is why they are in the predicament they're in. Put a shovel in the ground, build the fab, produce one wafer, THEN start running your mouth. These guys never change.

Perfect sense for Nvidia to work with 2 foundries and pick the best. Yeah if you want to double your mask costs, your design work, your engineering needs, your qualification efforts, increase forecasting complexity and then drop one or split the business (and probably get less of a volume discount?). Nvidia will have to choose in advance (though it could be on a product by product basis) or they will get snowed under by the engineering and logistic efforts.

Also, if Nvidia is courting GF because of x86 possibilities that is only STRENGTHENING Intel's case about AMD license issues and potential transfer to GF. I would doubt GF (or AMD) would want to touch that anytime soon. AMD has said they will divest from GF over time, so even if it is still considered a technical subsidiary right now, it will certainly not be one in the future (and therefore will lose any x86 license rights).

Where in the story is it indicated that GF is COURTING Nvidia... I see plenty of Nvidia kicking the tires, and AMD saying they will talk to anyone.. how does that go to GF courting Nvidia?

AMD's fabs have been some of the most flexible fabs in the world on the count that they needed to supply a lot of different CPU's and other products from the same single factory AND be able to upgrade it to a new process while it was still producing CPU's
flexibility is one of GF fab's main trump cards.

and it makes perfect sense for GF to want Nvidia as a customer. that way they make money no matter who won that generation's GFX war.
and it makes perfect sense for nvidia as they'll have 2 suppliers so they can go to the one that comes out best while at the same time getting the best price.
ATI will probably keep its relation to TSMC aswell.
that is, as long as TSMC can keep up to GF.

TSMC use to be the only fab you could go to as a fabless company to get cutting edge production processes. but GF is set to 'one up' TSMC with their extremely aggressive schedule for new process technology.

It makes no sense for globalfoundries to even consider working with nvidia. It's like shooting itself in a leg. Or maybe they can do 90nm stuff for nvidia ;)

I doubt GlobalFoundaries will pose a major threat to TSMC or UMC in the near future. The infrastructure those guys have allows them to be a lot more flexible than AMD fabs have been in the past. Though some serious competition to TSMC could be good for all..

( posting more pics of sylvie after having inq-fabois gush over her hasn't gone unnoticed! )