I just wanted to let you know that I am quitting my job as a journalist because I just got a better offer. Looks like going to SXSW 2009 in that skimpy outfit without panties was a good career move after all!

As for the photos, don't worry, there will be plenty of them soon, I just haven't decided on a name and that is were I need your help.

Sylvie reminds me of Sylvia Saint too much, and I wouldn't want to be mistaken for such a slu^H^H^H I mean legend :)

I am open to all suggestions as to what name I should use in my new line of work so please send your ideas to:

sylvie@theinquirer.net

You can also suggest what would you like to see in those photos.

XOXOXO
Sylvie

P.S. These are the names I thought of so far:

1. Labia Revsky
2. Ivy La Bakers

When you talk or write about the mess in the world, the shoe fits well with your comment on my comment also.

Yeah, I agree just the talk about smut is bad enough.

Having to listen to these blow-hards bang head on about they're missing their money shot!

Fortunately, I was protected from virgin earshotz by an articulated titillator, condomints of the INQ.

Give me bests to the vicarious!

lol..I dunno I've ever read that word on the INQ in the 3-odd years I've been coming on here. Way to go Sylvie!

Talking about online p0rnz...what about those shady webcam sites? You know the ones with not real p0rn stars but some amateurs...wonder if they too are running outta business.

BTW...p0rn if it wants to survive should set up some online store or something...and maybe let their customers interact in some messenger wit the actors or I don't see any other reason as too why one would stop downloading p0rnz for free & why just blame torrent there's plenty off other websites lurking around with copyrighted material catch them first before blaming torrents.

I think your comment is literary pollution.

-Bounty

I would like to hope this good news would further demise the smut industry.

But as it seams it looks like it's being sent on the free bandwagon, which could develop into a worst market than the first.

Nothing is free, you need power and a computer to see free stuff online that includes smut. But watching [ALL] useless smut will end up more expensive than anybody thought.

The energy used to generate smutty pictures is not put to good use, its wasteful, up there with the world's military budgets.

Smoking and smog is a respiratory lung pollution.

Loud Noise and swearing is an auditory pollution.

In this world, what would you class pollution by sight? Before you answer, isn't there more than one kind?

Smut is killing you, like a frog starting in cool water slowly boiling, even if your an evolutionist, watching the pot will prove how the crawling of time eliminates the week ones.

Save yourselves is saving the planet. The choice is yours, choose well, and prosper.

JPGs or it didn't happen!

AAAh sylvia where are you partying this saturday night in austin

But still, like the above guy says, who would still pay for stuff one can acquire for free from the likes of emule or other P2P networks.

Maybe some people still retain some morals and still think the actors and actress deserve the money, trouble is they enjoy the activity as well as getting paid for their time. And people like that guy hefner (playboys old git) made their billions out of this sh*t. You can almost say this is some legal slavery 'cos not all the cash goes to the people. Also that guy hefner is having sex with girls quarter his age or even younger. And they're quick to diss the arabs, i mean come on...

think on it or as the americans would say 'go figure' or some stupid statement like that.
Jon.

W/torrents on the more shadier side of the Net, and Sites like RedTube, or Tube8 which are all to varying degrees all free as in chips. Why would anyone pay for this stuff??

Come on you know it make sense...

Two different things... I usually applaud your puns, but this common mistake is above the INQ's usual standard..