The Inquirer-Home
Comments
Incomprehensible Summary

Congratulations, your summary manages to leave out just about every important fact of the case: that it was Qualcomm’s patents at issue, that Broadcom was suing to stop Qualcomm putting restrictions on downstream use of its licensed patents (doctrine of patent exhaustion), and that that patents had to do with chipsets for mobile phones.

posted by : Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 18 March 2009 Complain about this comment

Judge kills Broadcom patent lawsuit

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?