The Inquirer-Home
Comments
director

Thank goodness for lucid truth-tellers like Sean who are resisting irresponsible and disrespectful spin such as that apparently spewed by others here.
Taking the Verwaayen as genuine, we must thank you Sean for the good service you have provided to counter act the disservice from prior commenters. Well done.

posted by : julio, 06 March 2009 Complain about this comment
G.

Oh so quick-thinking and provocatively interpreted.

See for yourself the recording

MR. VERWAAYEN’S ANSWER:
“So WiMAX is a technology here to stay. I think that WiMAX is a great technology to
fill up those parts that it’s very hard to reach with other broadband access
technologies. We see it more as an extension of the DSL footprint. We don’t think
that it’s a viable option to compete against LTE as a mobile-only type of activity.
But other people may have different views.
“The beauty of it is, the technology is very much linked to what LTE does in the TD
atmosphere. So you can see that there is [sic] capabilities to experiment where to
go where not to go. Companies need to make decisions. Companies need to be clear
on the solutions they provide to the market. You can’t be a jack of all trades. We’ve
made a very clear position where to go. I think it will pay off for us.
“I see WiMAX as a viable technology to ensure you get a DSL footprint, a high-speed
broadband access footprint, that is really universal.”

posted by : Sean, 06 March 2009 Complain about this comment
He was in charge of BT for a while too.

Does he have a clue?

posted by : interested_party, 03 March 2009 Complain about this comment
Wimax

Hey, doesn't ALU make WIMAX equipment? Somebody tell Ben before he gives a speech to a real conference. Thanks. Pat.

PS Make sure my severance check arrives next week

posted by : Pat Russo, 03 March 2009 Complain about this comment

Alcatel-Lucent CEO blasts Wimax

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?