Really? Safari uses Webkit... Chrome uses Webkit.... Safari looks like a native app... chrome looks like some wierd GoogleOS app only google can relate to.
I really dont see the point! Get creative google!!
Uh, you seem to be confusing two separate things. WebKit is an open source HTML rendering engine. GTK+ is a GUI Tool Kit for making graphical window objects. As stated they are porting it to Cocoa, which is what Mac OS X 10.5.x uses. Other browsers using WebKit are Safari and Konquerer. Hope that this clears things up for you.
Really? Safari uses Webkit... Chrome uses Webkit.... Safari looks like a native app... chrome looks like some wierd GoogleOS app only google can relate to.
I really dont see the point! Get creative google!!
Uh, you seem to be confusing two separate things. WebKit is an open source HTML rendering engine. GTK+ is a GUI Tool Kit for making graphical window objects. As stated they are porting it to Cocoa, which is what Mac OS X 10.5.x uses. Other browsers using WebKit are Safari and Konquerer. Hope that this clears things up for you.
So they're using Webkit on OS X, but GTK on Linux? Webkit is working in KDE, not GTK. Oh well, I guess Google has lots of money.
anyone cares about chrome is expressed by three fourths of the comments on this post being devoted to paragraph breaks...
ooh neat
paragraph breaks.
nobody gives a crap about chrome.
thanks for enabling paragraph breaks. :)
did
i really
see a
paragraph break
in one of the
comments??
that UI looks *great*. Just keep it native-looking, Google, and don't fuck it up trying to make it look identical to the windows version.
Not that the windows version doesn't look good. It looks brilliant. But... context matters, you know...