The Inquirer-Home
Comments
destroy evidence?

Where is their right against self-incrimination? Every company I've ever heard about doing something wrong has allegedly destroyed their own evidence against themselves and simply blamed the loss of data on incompetence rather than intention. Not to mention the Bush Administration. In the majority of those cases, they may have been charged with evidence destruction but never lost their defense case based solely on the fact that they wouldn't prove their own guilt. Just more proof that justice isn't equally administered.

posted by : CB, 05 February 2009 Complain about this comment
it's a crime to destroy evidence

Too bad for TorrentSpy. They chose to commit a crime by destroying evidence that could have convicted them, so they should be charged with two crimes.

posted by : Robert, 05 February 2009 Complain about this comment
Logs?

The only reason they would waste disk space by storing logs of every search/download is for police use. Why everybody always assume that all services log everything? Because Google does? Also, wasn't in this case that a judge asked for the contents of the RAM memory of their servers? Now they conclude that it was destroyed. Pathetic.

posted by : mycelo, 05 February 2009 Complain about this comment
TPB

TPB FTW!

posted by : ssj4Gogeta, 05 February 2009 Complain about this comment

TorrentSpy restarts fight against MPAA

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?