The Inquirer-Home
Comments
The Wants Of The [Chosen] Few

Are the following true:
1. Should every human opts to just accept what he needs and not what he wants, the universe will have real peace whilst not forgetting that it is peace which leads to joy/the-reason-for-existing, not excitements, which merely lead to more wants/addictions;
2. When there is real peace, will there be problems like credit, artificial taxation oka govermental plunder, over/under-consumption, over/under-production, thefts masquerading as economic/financial “exchanges”, insurance, entrepreneurial “creativity”, territorial consolidation, etc?
3. Since humanity did not lift a finger to evolved from dust to his present state, and since he lacks the true knowledge-cum-power to realise how it all happened, and since he is not even the master of his own self, is he not merely juggling within the realms of statistics – the universe of the partially sighted/blind?

If true, we are merely vapourising. Unless and until we have found reality, we’ve found nothing. Ojectivity, assuming all that we survey as the end-all, be-all, allows for intellect to imagine that the universe depends on its viewpoint. Femininity is for complementing/rescuing masculinity [and vice-versa] and not for opposing it for if both are actually one and the same at a different moment/timing, what’s all the wants in aid of?

A want/empowerment-through-division is the result of separating/differentiating an absolute [witness nuclear fission] and was/is Reality’s way/play of allowing for, as well as limiting, destruction. Why? Because to realise that our thoughts/destruction is the reason for our limitation is eureka/realisation itself. Imagine, being able to realise that it is the awareness of thoughts which limits one’s ascent towards higher/absolute awareness.

The way to solve any problem is to first become thoughtless, an impossibility for those who have yet to realised that there is such a thing as being thoughtless. A thought rises from the future, crosses over to the present and within that split second of thoughtlessness, we perceive Intelligence, and the thought then becomes the past. To expand that moment of thoughtlessness is how all problems will be solved – by Nature Herself. Not dynamite prize winners. That is true faith because when we perceive Intelligence, we also become the channels for Its power and the Power of Intelligence is Love.

If one possesses all the powers within creation [omni-potent/present/scient], accumulation/power has no meaning. Love’s duty is to give or else She has no meaning. From that we can see what beggary & thievery [i.e accumulations] really mean. It means a constant sense of impoverishment – addiction to the lack of self-valuation – those who need to be constantly comforted by their need/addiction for Fame, Fortune & Immortality.

Thoughts of the past are merely states of lunacy and thoughts of the future-cum-objectivity are merely states of idiocy. Humans are not supposed to think their way out of their juxtapositions. We are supposed to realise why we have the juxtaposition. A human being is his Attention whose “seat” resides within his liver. We are not our thoughts of subjectivity, objectivity & projectivity. Because Love is our true/absolute Mother [whilst not forgetting that everything that is latent/artificial/representative has/reflects its absolute – i.e. our emotional, physical & intellectual mothers are just the means to an end], and She is Creation Itself, where is the problem?

The problem is, “Does She exists”… and the answer is not through belief nor disbelief, it is how we may realise and those who do realise cannot convey the message/reality, it has to be experienced which is why the lunacy of artificial faith leads to religion. Religion is when faith/belief has no power/reality – this is why religion, like every aspect which is absolute, is within. Should the individual be at peace, everything else is peaceful according to him.

We have to find our reality within before we can decide what is real or not real on the outside. That’s why there are those who think that taking from others will fill their void – seen as satified plunders/addicts lately – including peace-explosives. It is hard to believe but easy to realise that 6 billion non-realised cannot even equate to one who is realised. Why? Because they have yet to realised that Creation is not only not within their minds/idiocy-cum-lunacy, but that Creation is real and can solve any problem posed before Her. The difference between the first and the last is imaginary and only exists within the minds of a differentiated truth and its power.

It would be benevolent to realised that many realised souls are taking their birth within these contemporary times for the true blossom time has arrived. The problem is, many are being damaged by the madness we can all see before us but not when The Mother is at hand. As they say, it’s going to get worse [if, and] before it gets any better.

posted by : sir gallivant, 01 February 2009 Complain about this comment
here we go again

I may not agree with Gore on all of his points, but the fact of it is global warming is occuring. Its kind of ludicrous to think that such a drastic temperature change in the past hundred years or so since the industrial evolution should not be attributed to global emmisions. To the critics who say that this is a natural occurance, please show me any proof of such a drastic temperature change in a hundred year span and blame it on nature. Maybe the endangered species are farting and producing methane, better go eat some dolphins while were at it to. Point of it is, its happening, either we deal with it or our children and their children deal with it. Im sure none of us would like a lovely global crisis handed down to us from previous generations.

posted by : Max, 30 January 2009 Complain about this comment
Enviroloons

Who let all the green loonies in here? I thought this was the sort of site which attracted folks who could think for themselves not just regurgitate the latest BBC/UN/Gore grabage. The complaints about the story being one sided are a bit rich coming from this crowd.

posted by : Bertfeg, 30 January 2009 Complain about this comment
People should research this themselves

People should not listen to oracles, prophets and gurus but do their own research of various points of views. There is a nice little primer on this page:

http://joannenova.com.au/global-warming/

posted by : Bernard, 30 January 2009 Complain about this comment
To those who came before

@ Global Cooling
That's right, close your eyes, and listen to what you want to hear.

Mind telling the same story to the Inuit or anyone from Greenland?

They're the ones living closer to the edge than you are, and they see the melting affect.
---
@ the planets not dying
Of course, the planet will still be here. All the larger plant and animal life won't.
Earth won't die until its boiled and than consumed by the Sun.
---
Anyone else... We're doomed environmentally, and economically because we, the people of earth, have become gluttonous.

We're destroying ourselves by over consumption of food, and materialistic things.

We're on average considerably more overweight than we were 20-30 years ago.

For one example, we've widened the opening for pop cans so that we can consume it at a faster pace, and open up a new can. Before we might have stopped.

We have more garbage in landfills.
We're consuming more and more.

Its about time to conserve on energy, food, and in general the way we spend.
---
@ Sylvie Barak & INQ
Maybe I should stop reading the INQ because of one sided stories such as yours.
Either post some unbiased journalism, or another post that reflects the opposite of your views.
Yes, I know, you have solar panels at the INQ headquarters.

posted by : Paul, 30 January 2009 Complain about this comment
Wow

I didn't realize that using linux and keeping up on tech news went hand in hand with rabid anti environmentalism. Seriously, is this the tinfoil hat crowd posting on here? Everything's a socialist conspiracy to tax carbon? Only 50 scientists believe that global warming will adversely affect human life? Nobody is saying that the planet will blow up, but they are saying that it will have very bad consequences for human life. How is toxic wastes in the water and air Not a bad thing? Please adjust your tinfoil hats so they stop cutting off valuable blood circulation to your heads.

posted by : SaveusJeebus, 30 January 2009 Complain about this comment
the planets not dying

The arrogance to think our little co2 emissions are going to destroy a planet millions of years old is mind boggling. You climate change [global warming] nazis need to get over yourselves. This planet is not going anywhere u are. Carbon tax,,,, God help us...

posted by : henry, 30 January 2009 Complain about this comment
Idiot

He should just come out and say it, he really pressing for a Carbon Tax for the NWO. They need a tax base after all and that is it.

So sure he has 50 or so Scientists whom agree with him it's 100% Human Made.
But there are 1000+ whom disagree with him.... Let the truth be knowen! It's just another tax to get the NWO funded..

posted by : Minotaur, 30 January 2009 Complain about this comment
al

the best thing for everyone would be if someone would put duct tape over al gores mouth. It would save us from the most toxic Co2 around!

posted by : Mark Ross, 30 January 2009 Complain about this comment
Only dangerous if you can tax it

See if the temperature rising was the result of solar activity, which it was, you can't tax the sun. It needs to be cause by C02 that way we can tax productivity and diperse that wealth like good socialist do. DISGUSTING LYING BASTARDS.

posted by : Steve, 30 January 2009 Complain about this comment
MOOBS....

Heres' BBC Article on Something More Horendous Than Gobi Desert, MOOBS: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/magazine/7855763.stm Don't Miss Single Graphic Example,Shockingly MOOBS Carries More Weight than Global Wormin' & Is SomeThing You Can ?Spot today?Over 80% of ALL TransSexuals have MOOBS!Mike Had MOOBS, Charlie Has Creeping MOOBS, Paul, YeP, Its' MOOBS. STeWie Drashek

posted by : Ultee'_Tom, 30 January 2009 Complain about this comment
Who knows

Lets be honest nobody really knows what will happen with planet. I for one am all for reducing the polution even if its under the false pretence of global warming. All of the polution being pumped into the air, land and oceans cant possibly be good for life.

posted by : James, 30 January 2009 Complain about this comment
You will care one day but it will your children that suffer

Judging by the sarcastic article and idiotic comments posted here, clearly this is not the forum to discuss issues related to survival of the planet.

posted by : OGB, 30 January 2009 Complain about this comment
Yawn...

Yes, please inform Al Bore that scientists now believe we're headed toward another ice age. Oh, and when will these environmental wackos understand that trying to fix the ecosystem actual does more harm than good?

posted by : LinuxLover, 30 January 2009 Complain about this comment
Bingo

It's skeptics' bingo here in the comments: "declining temperatures since 1998" and, in China, "2 [...] new coal plants PER WEEK". All the myths in one place at last!

posted by : Horse, 29 January 2009 Complain about this comment
Gore is an idiot

99% of what he bases his information is on studies done by scientests that only get paid if they can show there is global warming. Then he smears the data even more. NASA shows that 3 other planets in the solar system are going through the same warming telling you that this is a solar warming effect, not man made. On top of that we are at the end of an ice age and temps are supposed to go up. Yes man kind does creat polution, but look at China. Nobody seems to care what they are doing. How about this... change NAFTA rules so that companies from other countries that want to import goods into the US without getting fined tarrifs (like it used to be before NAFTA) have to obide by the same environmental and employee laws (or better) than what the US has. Do the same thing for outsourcing. Most companies that outsource do so to avoid these two laws in the US (and other countries) at the detriment of other countries natural resources and people. Countries like China only care about the quick cash and have ruined their country more than the US has ever done. But Al Gore wants us to also give money and technology to China to help clean up their mess. Well China will take the money and use only technology that will save them more money and screw the rest. The sad thing is though this mentality has hurt the countries that were treating employees and the environment good and now nobody will be able to do anything Al wants without hurting the world more in the long run.

posted by : Todd, 29 January 2009 Complain about this comment
An inconvenient plan

"Gore who claimed working towards renewable energy would create loads of jobs and help the US cut ties with nasty, oil-hoarding regimes."

What is rather amusing is the tie in now with national security, despite the fact that renewable energy's most dramatic impact is on electrical generation, which in the US is over 50% COAL BASED (coal is also a much more significant polluter than say oil). So the US will reduce its dependency on US Coal... whew the US will be much safer thanks to that! Of course this will make coal a lot cheaper and make it a less valuable export to China (who is building 2 coal new coal plants PER WEEK). The lower prices will surely encourage China to stop using it and move to a much more expensive solution! And the side benefit is the trade deficit with China will expand thanks to the cheaper coal.

Good for the environment? Yes. Tied to national and economic security? That would be an inconvenient UNTRUTH. Oh and by the way, another inconvenient truth - the nasty oil hording countries the US primarily gets our imported oil from? Mexico and Canada! (Shhh....don't tell anyone)

posted by : The sky is falling, 29 January 2009 Complain about this comment
Global cooling

Someone better let Al know about the recent sharp increase Arctic ice and declining temperatures since 1998.

posted by : Global warming is a political movement, 29 January 2009 Complain about this comment

Gore lectures Senate on global warming. Again.

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?