I would much like somebody to tell me how RIAA gained the evidence needed to sue the "infrigers", and why the court accepted them. They can either do this by 1)Making your ISP co-operate in watching you (hope they make this clear in the contract) 2)Spy on your machine or 3)Take part in the illegal distribution game, by illegally distributing their own content and see you downloads it (yes, they do this).
All of these, of course, if you live in DMCAland, where the property of music companies is above any god or privacy right.
Anyway, it's our fault, for not caring about protecting our privacy, with encryptions and proxies. Then, they would have zero evidence and we would be the winners.
Well, it was about time.
I would much like somebody to tell me how RIAA gained the evidence needed to sue the "infrigers", and why the court accepted them. They can either do this by 1)Making your ISP co-operate in watching you (hope they make this clear in the contract) 2)Spy on your machine or 3)Take part in the illegal distribution game, by illegally distributing their own content and see you downloads it (yes, they do this).
All of these, of course, if you live in DMCAland, where the property of music companies is above any god or privacy right.
Anyway, it's our fault, for not caring about protecting our privacy, with encryptions and proxies. Then, they would have zero evidence and we would be the winners.
A judge with common sense ????
OMG the end is nigh!!!