They probably just want to market it to what they see as an emerging platform. Developers are unlikely to develop for X86, PPC, and ARM based netbooks. With other manufacturers looking to produce ARM CPUs for netbooks, thats where the momentum seems to be. Plus the MPC5200 is based on a 400MHz 603e, a design that, while good, is unlikely to stand up against an Atom. They'd need to at least throw something similar to IBM's PPC750FX at it at a similar speed in order to be competitive. Since they had to design a new chip anyways, it makes sense to go with a platform that looks to have some legs and some other possible uses (i.e. Windows Mobile PDAs and Smartphones).
to say... Any chance we could get RISC OS runing on this?
There. I feel so much better having stated that.
I always wanted a decent phone (PDA phones), why aren't there any?
Pls stick a couple of this thing into a PDA phone and start selling it. Can't be bother to wait for the Tegra, no one is using it...
Thanks
They probably just want to market it to what they see as an emerging platform. Developers are unlikely to develop for X86, PPC, and ARM based netbooks. With other manufacturers looking to produce ARM CPUs for netbooks, thats where the momentum seems to be. Plus the MPC5200 is based on a 400MHz 603e, a design that, while good, is unlikely to stand up against an Atom. They'd need to at least throw something similar to IBM's PPC750FX at it at a similar speed in order to be competitive. Since they had to design a new chip anyways, it makes sense to go with a platform that looks to have some legs and some other possible uses (i.e. Windows Mobile PDAs and Smartphones).
Strange that Freescale wouldn't use their own PPC (e.g. the MPC5200 low-power linux compatible embedded device).
That doesn't seem to bode very well for their own designs.
HB