The Inquirer-Home
Comments
AMD has ATI, so it's sitting pretty for 2009.

ATI is kicking Nvidia everywhere, price and performance. NVidia is kicking customers with bad products that they know are shite and will fail.

AMD's cpu's are not as good for gaming, but they are still cheap, cheerful and powerful enough for the 95% of PC buyers. That's where the real money is.

AMD has ATI so they can provide a 1-stop-shop solution, CPU, GPU and motherboard chipsets to the Taiwanese, and so to the rest of us.

AMD is still kicking Intel for some server stuff, including Virtualisation.

posted by : interested_party, 04 January 2009 Complain about this comment
Whuot? Is That a Bird?

Thar hors fete had ner all away!

posted by : The Femme Den’s obCESsion, 03 January 2009 Complain about this comment
AMD has to pay for Charlies propoganda somehow.

All those poor workers who actually produced somethign useful, and what does AMD do with their money? They pay Charlie "the shill" Demerjian to write anti-NVIDIA propoganda.

posted by : E. Chen, 01 January 2009 Complain about this comment
Can I hire some of AMD's acountants?

This is now the 3rd time AMD has "taken a charge" on the ATI acquisition. Exactly how many times can you value, re-value, re-re-value, re-re-re-value ATI? Also, don't non-profit organizations pay no/reduced taxes?

posted by : enron_accountant, 01 January 2009 Complain about this comment
My friend was right

AMD needs one heck of a breakthrough or financial angel right now. Their only hope is a breakthrough of the Athlon 64 (vs the P4 at the initial release) now if they don't find a angel with bags of money. That's not entirely unlikely: see the Dubai foundry deal.

posted by : Joe Servov, 01 January 2009 Complain about this comment

AMD lays off 100 more

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?