Jesus Nick, call the waaambulance and get it over with. Everywhere Girl is not notable. She has never been notable. If she ever becomes notable, the concept of Everywhere Girl will be one sentence in the trivia section at the bottom of the page.
These past few years of Wikipedia bashing have gone from mildly amusing to meh to stfu. Your bias is unprofessional in the extreme. At least Charlie frequently had a leg to stand on with Nvidia.
Shouldn't this go towards MediaWiki?

I've cried out for a better editor for Wiki editors. 

The current editor was designed by programmers who think having a mark-up language, even one as simple as it is at present is good enough- It isn't!

Why can't they make a WYSIWYG editor like they have for open source web page editors?

A lot of would-be editors I've came across don't want to learn how to label up a table or even how to do the simple stuff like how to do headers. 

They know how to use Word techniques, so why not base an editor on similar methods?

An in-place modern editor given to MediaWiki would benefit everyone, not just Wikipedia.
Ultee' Tom, that Loved Pundit whom Makes theINQ such as it is, Commentos, is Now Much More than dual Head Ultimat, Ultee' Tom is writen, Commented Upon & Praised by Billions.

Sea Lions Love Ultee' Tom, theINQ loves Ultee' & Tom, Tappity, Tap,Tap. Goes On.

Writing is like Timex, its Takes Lickin' & Keeps on Tickin'.Of Course, Being attached to 135 Hp Johnson OutBoard Propeller isn't Much Fun, Yet Ultee' Tom Survives with theINQ Templeate.

opps, meant writing is like Kleenix, Pure before use, useless after.
STeWie Drashek
Jesus Nick, call the waaambulance and get it over with. Everywhere Girl is not notable. She has never been notable. If she ever becomes notable, the concept of Everywhere Girl will be one sentence in the trivia section at the bottom of the page.
These past few years of Wikipedia bashing have gone from mildly amusing to meh to stfu. Your bias is unprofessional in the extreme. At least Charlie frequently had a leg to stand on with Nvidia.
Shouldn't this go towards MediaWiki?

I've cried out for a better editor for Wiki editors. 

The current editor was designed by programmers who think having a mark-up language, even one as simple as it is at present is good enough- It isn't!

Why can't they make a WYSIWYG editor like they have for open source web page editors?

A lot of would-be editors I've came across don't want to learn how to label up a table or even how to do the simple stuff like how to do headers. 

They know how to use Word techniques, so why not base an editor on similar methods?

An in-place modern editor given to MediaWiki would benefit everyone, not just Wikipedia.
Ultee' Tom, that Loved Pundit whom Makes theINQ such as it is, Commentos, is Now Much More than dual Head Ultimat, Ultee' Tom is writen, Commented Upon & Praised by Billions.

Sea Lions Love Ultee' Tom, theINQ loves Ultee' & Tom, Tappity, Tap,Tap. Goes On.

Writing is like Timex, its Takes Lickin' & Keeps on Tickin'.Of Course, Being attached to 135 Hp Johnson OutBoard Propeller isn't Much Fun, Yet Ultee' Tom Survives with theINQ Templeate.

opps, meant writing is like Kleenix, Pure before use, useless after.
STeWie Drashek