The Inquirer-Home
Comments
Parents responsibility

Surely if we are trying to protect children from seeing things they shouldn't then parents should be putting software in place to filter out this sort of content? I make sure my daughter can't visit any nasty sites but I wouldn't want to stop others from searching for the content they want. I don't have that right and neither should anyone else. If someone tried telling me what I could and couldn't look at I would be most annoyed!


posted by : bob, 18 November 2008 Complain about this comment
Do it for the children

Where do they get this idea that children are harmed by accidentally seeing sexually explicit material? Do they think an infant has never seen a breast?

First, children have no libido. They don't go seeking this stuff like I^H men do. (Unless it's to giggle at it.)

Second, anyone claiming that seeing this harms children should be told to put up proof or SHUT UP. Same with the anti-violence crowd. 

These people would probably be pretty annoyed if they were publicly asked for proof every time they brought up their bogus arguments.


posted by : Guy Gordon, 17 November 2008 Complain about this comment
Save the children

Save the children - and the next day the government cuts funding for education. Sick culture.

posted by : Educator, 17 November 2008 Complain about this comment
Spyware Id card

yup the tracking spyware national ID card
all nations want it

posted by : corwin155, 17 November 2008 Complain about this comment

Ministers want to name and shame ISPs

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?