The Inquirer-Home
Comments
You FRICKIN guys

A $200 billion a year industry is NOT A GAME. You dufuses (Otellini and ex-Ruiz) are ruining the rest of our economy with this FIRE SALE NONSENSE.

Why do you media people treat this like some joke when billions of dollars are being burned up by a maniacal MONOPOLIST that spits in even their partners' faces.

Leave MS alone and deal with Intel. They actually own stuff that isn't IP.

posted by : Some Guy, 12 November 2008 Complain about this comment
NY is 22nm

They will start production at 32nm, but they will be the first at 22nm and 15nm.

posted by : Daniel de França MTd2, 12 November 2008 Complain about this comment
AMD always plans to catch up by the next process node ...

Hasn't happened yet, in fact, Intel's lead has, if anything, increased over the past 2-4 process generations.

All the money in the world won't bring them to 32nm SOI in 12 months, but I guess there's always a next round of hopes and high expectations ...

posted by : Proesterchen, 12 November 2008 Complain about this comment
what happened to outsourcing

I thought they said they were going to be outsourcing all their chip manufacturing, and I wonder whatever happened to that AM3 socket.....

posted by : zubree, 12 November 2008 Complain about this comment
How about New York

Hey, whats happening with the NY stat fab?

posted by : Matt, 12 November 2008 Complain about this comment
Farming Out Manufacturing

Those tech purchases would be of chips, not manufacturing equipment. The article does mention at the end the Asians making CPU's and GPU's.

That AMD is focusing on moving to 32nm is really, really good news. For so long they have relegated themselves to playing catchup.

I see this as their only long term hope for becoming competitive again.

posted by : Bill Koehler, 12 November 2008 Complain about this comment
Why NOT TSMC?

Didn't they already make AMD dies prior to Fab36 (45nm) on some level, along with dies for their ATI cards since even before the 2900 series? Not positive about the CPU's...but ya, TSMC makes ATI/AMD cores.

No real surprise if TSMC makes the Fusion processor. If TSMC announces they are 32nm capable, AMD doesn't "burden" them with tools and request.

If I make widgets capable of what you're aiming for, I welcome your contracts for those widgets and smile at requests for more. That makes money and is the purpose of companies like this.

posted by : TheDude, 12 November 2008 Complain about this comment
HEEHAW

Sort of like the noise a donkey makes. This makes me do it.

posted by : Moomanerism3, 11 November 2008 Complain about this comment
Purchase from TSMC... Sure....

"TSMC, for one, has announced 32nm high-k dielectric manufacturing for Q4 2009, which puts it ahead of the pack and is the most likely source for AMD/ATIC/TFC’s tech purchase."

Uhhh, why would AMD be purchasing anything tech process wise from TSMC?!

I think they are likely to purchase their FAB (tech process) equipment from the likes of Applied Materials, ASML Holding, Axcelis Technologies, Intevac, Novellus Systems, Lam Research, TEL, Aviza Technology Inc., KLA-Tencor, Ulvac, Varian Semiconductor, DAS GmbH Dresden Germany, Kornic Systems Corporation Korea before they trouble TSMC with FAB/Process equipment/technology requests....

posted by : gstanford, 11 November 2008 Complain about this comment

AMD announces move to 32nm

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?