The Inquirer-Home
Comments
not long at all

Intel already has this technology, or something very close to it. and OCZ's core 3 series will likely be very very fast as well.

posted by : grndzro, 15 November 2008 Complain about this comment
Once again--

How long will it take their competetors to reverse engi.. I mean "EXAMINE" it and make their own version?

posted by : viscountalpha, 10 November 2008 Complain about this comment
FTL is rubbish

I like this idea. The Flash Transaction Layer (FTL) which is programmed into the firmware of current SSDs (for compatibility) is rubbish. You basically wind up with a device that has all the pitfalls of both pancake-stack storage and flash.

I'm hoping that we can re-flash our old firmwares when this is stable. There's also some Open Sauce SSD filesystems in the works :)

posted by : Russell, 10 November 2008 Complain about this comment
Doesn't make any sense? No seek time?

It might be right that there is "No seek time" or very little. The slow down was caused on the File System and Operating system level, not the hardware level. There are many checking and correcting procedures during a write. For different FS, writing speed and results are different. Try it for yourself.

So, changing/improving a file system for flash based memory may help as described by Sandisk. It makes sense. Whether the new file system works as described is another matter, but believe me, file system does affect performance.

posted by : Felix, 08 November 2008 Complain about this comment
Doesn't Make Any Sense

It doesn't make any difference WHERE on the disk you put a block. It's not a hard drive--there's no "seek time".

posted by : Lawrence D'Oliveiro, 07 November 2008 Complain about this comment
Expensive? What are you smoking?

Err, its a file system. It should be free.

posted by : Anonymous, 07 November 2008 Complain about this comment
Yeah, SanDisk.

Maybe SanDisk should have been bought, as write speed, u[p till now, has been 1/2 read speed. So SanDisk1, All Others 0.

Also, Like Idea of Pulling Up Its'(sandisk)Technology By its' Own BootStraps.
TS Drashek

posted by : gOODeNOUGH, 06 November 2008 Complain about this comment
Extra cost - probably not much

The FFS stuff will be done at a firmware level and can no doubt be done pretty cheaply. The major cost of a decent sized flash drive will still be the flash memory itself.

The point is that existing filesystems (NTFS, FAT, ext3 for you Linux boys) were written for hard disks. Sandisk is just trying to balance that. Flash's one weakpoint is lots of small random writes.

Just one more nail in the hard disk coffin. I was argueing this with Seagate investors a year ago. Since then their shares fell 60%+ and I made a mint!

posted by : Will Smith, 06 November 2008 Complain about this comment
$$$

I can only imagine how much more this will cost...

posted by : Coma, 06 November 2008 Complain about this comment

Sandisk speeds up SSD

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?