The Inquirer-Home
Comments
WTH?

If the studios are so hell bent on blaming piracy for their losses, why don't we see movies for 2.90 here in the states? If they can make a profit from a 2.90 DVD in China, then the same profit should be available here.

What a load of crap!

posted by : RM, 08 November 2007 Complain about this comment
How impressive

Trying to combat piracy by lowering prices on a piece of crap is not going to work well, and Shrek III is nothing but crap.
Transformers is going to appeal to a niche market, so that's a bit different, but frankly put, I wouldn't pay to see Shrek III, you'd have to pay me.
So I'm not impressed.

posted by : Pascal Monett, 08 November 2007 Complain about this comment
IND too

Please apply that policy to Indonesia :). It will work charmed better than using super duper MGA (Movie Genuine Advantage). :)). By the way, why Microsoft didn't sue movie industri because they use the same WGA term =)) (of course Microsoft First use it).

posted by : Hok, 08 November 2007 Complain about this comment
price reduction everywhere

china isnt the only place there is piracy, in australia we have to pay 39 odd dollars for a dvd, thats why there is Piracy, people say stuff this and go download it for nothing, time to stop being greedy movie and music studios and start being reasonable, thats all they want you know, REASONABLE PRICES

posted by : stew , 08 November 2007 Complain about this comment
What took you so long?!

How much time did it take for them to realize that there was no way they could win the war against piracy with dumb-ass law suits?

RIAA!! Are you reading?! YOU MORONS!

Cheers.

posted by : Aenslead, 07 November 2007 Complain about this comment
$2.90...

And you can bet they're still making a profit on each one.

Gives you a rough idea how they can afford all those lawyers doesn't it.

posted by : Steve, 07 November 2007 Complain about this comment
No Pirates in America

So, piracy in the rest of the world isn't a problem then?

posted by : Ed3, 07 November 2007 Complain about this comment
the real cost of media

Well it's good to see they're pricing media at what it really costs to produce. I'm skeptical that it will spread to other countries, or music and software.

Would be nice, though.

Cheers,
John

posted by : John, 07 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Its not about the price

They should have taken a look at what Radiohead did.Half the people that took the goods didn't pay anything at all.
This splits the world into 2 types of people.
Those that pay and those that don't.

Those that pay, don't mind doing so , and dropping prices,whilst pleasing for them, wont stop them continuing to pay.
However , those that thieve, still wont pay , no matter how cheep you make things.They are thieves and they will still go on thieving ,even it the product was free.For them its not about the price , its just about price.You wont ever get money out of them , and they wont change their practices.they are a lost generation.

posted by : paul, 07 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Warner price cut

Great, so they cut the price of their DVDs in China! Now how about cutting DVD prices in the US, instead of continuing to suck dry the domestic market, you useless parasitical Bolsheviks!

posted by : Rich Wargo, 07 November 2007 Complain about this comment
Slim Chance

I highly doubt prices will change anywhere else. I'd even be surprised to hear this story outside of the INQ.

$2.90? How do they justify DVD prices in the USA, where it's $20 a pop? Perhaps to cover shipping costs from China to the USA?

And I've got $50 that says the RIAA will never follow suit. Any takers?

posted by : JPod, 07 November 2007 Complain about this comment

Warner battles piracy by cutting prices

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Authorities in several countries raided Megaupload recently, shut down all of its services, seized hundreds of servers and arrested several of its executives on criminal charges.

Do you think the move was justified?