The "new" cards may finally have PCIe, but
they are still single-link. Max 1920x1200 on
each DVI screen. Apparently can't even
shotgun the two ports as a single dual-link.

If you want to run 2560x1600, you still have
to buy that preposterous Parhelia 256DL
PCI-X card. Meanwhile, all the competition
is dual link across most of their products.

I am sorry but that is a little too expensive for that specification. If I was an IT Manager, I would get a HD 2400 which I think consumes slightly more power, but is more than half the cost.

Wao 90nm can have 12 W, I wonder why they (Matrox) use 55 nM like G92 and R670. Matrox old style: Create expensive, slow, professional market, multimonitor, minimum memory, and have their on new api. Do this time they also support DX 10.1+ ?

ATI have their FireMV series of cards that does the same thing. 

PCI, PCIe x1 bus
Dual and Quad monitor support DVI

they have half height and fullheight mount brackets


I got the PCIe x1 version for $135 off ebay
and it has quad DVI support (no extra cables to buy) and it's 256 megs of ram.

this Matrox thing is just too little too late and too expensive