The Inquirer-Home
Comments
Learn to read more

No I'm not insane. I think what he did was idiotic, even paranoid. That being said if you read a few other articles you'd have known this guy didn't turn anything off. He didn't wreck anything. Heck everything was working perfectly when he was fired and walked away.

That the city was idiotic enough to have never implemented a policy of how to save passwords and configs was THEIR fault. They wore blinders to the fact that ONE person was the ONLY ONE with the keys to the kingdom. (apparently there are memos from other offices complaining about this and his treatment of other city network staff, such as not trusting them to config their own equipment or have passwords) What would you have been saying had he been in an accident? That he was a paranoid wanker? Probably. Would you have been calling him a criminal? No.

The city was blatantly dishonest here. He didn't blackmail the city, he was no longer in their employ. I'm sorry, but if my former boss (that just fired me for what I don't consider good reasons) called me up and said "Erm, you don't happen to have time to give me the passwords do you?" My answer pretty much would have been "Bite me." I'm sorry but his obligation to the city ended the MOMENT they fired him.

You let a paranoid run a work area how they see fit, and you don't exactly get an environment conducive to change. I'd like to bet the city still hasn't learned this, and that the network will still get f*cked.

posted by : Alex Cross, 26 July 2008 Complain about this comment
what

Alex Cross - are you insane???????????????????

posted by : what, 24 July 2008 Complain about this comment
Correction

He did not shut down part of the network or make resources unavailable. While he had been refusing to surrender the passwords, it did not prevent the city from conducting it's usual business.

posted by : Kevin, 24 July 2008 Complain about this comment
They're lucky

he just wanted out of jail. They fired him BEFORE getting all the information from him. They should count themselves lucky here and drop all charges. Nobody above checked on this guy's work once and let him run the area as he saw fit.

I don't agree with the way he had it set up, but he did not do anything illegal. The city publicizing it the way they were was to generate pressure on the defense attorney to get the codes. As an EX-employee, he was no longer burdened with the requirement to give them up.

posted by : Alex Cross, 23 July 2008 Complain about this comment

Network hijacker has change of heart

aboutus
Advertisement
Subscribe to INQ newsletters
Advertisement
INQ Poll

Facebook starts selling shares

Will you buy Facebook shares?