Once again, the INQ publishes an already boring story twice!

http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/08/28/firefox-gets-better-site-id
Surely self-signed certificates are better than no encryption at all..
Problem with all this malarkey is it makes self-certs seem WORSE, which is clearly wrong.
I have to punch around Firefox for University of Texas site. They appear to have a self-signed certificate.
Once again, the INQ publishes an already boring story twice!

http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/08/28/firefox-gets-better-site-id
Surely self-signed certificates are better than no encryption at all..
Problem with all this malarkey is it makes self-certs seem WORSE, which is clearly wrong.