I have a PS3 and I have no problem what so ever with fan noise.

If they are working on a small console version fine but as I said noise is not an issue.

Will it play PS2 games? Will it be cheaper?

Will the games still be 30% dearer than the same game on pc?

If the games cost the same as pc I might buy one. If it played PS2 games, I might buy one.

I probably still wouldn't buy one.
Stewart

lol, so funny, haa ha haa haa haa

PS3 101 for dummies, you need it Stewart, before claiming non-sense

and i highly doubt the ps3 will be "slim" any time soon this year
Cell has been 65nm for a long time now. (all 40GB PS3's have a 65nm Cell in them). Sony/Toshiba/IBM have been fabbing 65nm Cells for nearly 2 years..

What is about to change, is RSX is moving from 90nm to 65nm too.

So I suppose your article is half right at least (and 1000% more accurate than a Charlie Demerjian "artice")
My Ps3 is quieter than my DVD player.
Given Nv and IBM's current process tech's 45/65 seems far more likely for the next upgrade to the ps3,
I have a PS3 and I have no problem what so ever with fan noise.

If they are working on a small console version fine but as I said noise is not an issue.

Will it play PS2 games? Will it be cheaper?

Will the games still be 30% dearer than the same game on pc?

If the games cost the same as pc I might buy one. If it played PS2 games, I might buy one.

I probably still wouldn't buy one.
I believe the upcoming PS3 will be using 45nm Cell chips and 65nm RSXs.
surely u mean SONY - Maker of exploding batteries?

I assure you, this hasnt got unfunny yet
Stewart

lol, so funny, haa ha haa haa haa

PS3 101 for dummies, you need it Stewart, before claiming non-sense

and i highly doubt the ps3 will be "slim" any time soon this year
The 40GB version already has a 65nm cell CPU.
The GPU is 90nm though.
Cell has been 65nm for a long time now. (all 40GB PS3's have a 65nm Cell in them). Sony/Toshiba/IBM have been fabbing 65nm Cells for nearly 2 years..

What is about to change, is RSX is moving from 90nm to 65nm too.

So I suppose your article is half right at least (and 1000% more accurate than a Charlie Demerjian "artice")