Maybe you'd fancy doing a search and finding out what has indeed already been written ?
For example : http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/09/11/facebook-cements-look

Its just a shame you didn't use your ordinary 'he ejaculated' phrase instead of 'he said'.

In the headline and the lead sentence we find the word "notworking." At the beginning of the fourth paragraph we find "not-working" (including hyphen) but later in the same we find "networking." And that's it for any of those terms here. WTF? Typos? A bit too many for that to be plausible, I feel.

People have bookmarked or learned by heart the URL of their favourite porn site so they don't have to search for them anymore ;)

SEARCHES for porn are down.
People know where to find it now.
(Yarr.)

It's still the king in temrs of actual time, hits, data, and... well, I'll leave the last one up to you...

Surely people go on network sites because they can get their fix of sexual activity without dodgy porn popups(!), needing a credit card to even access the site, and probably because they may escape a nasty infection....pc wise or not!?!?!

This morning Facebook has made the move to the so called "New Facebook", they've now forced all users onto the new system and as they say on the site, new facebook is now the only facebook.

I was wondering if any of you guys thought this was news worthy and fancied writing an article on it :)

That's because many of the social notworking sites allow users to chat on their webcams, and it's sometimes a lot more fun getting a real person naked than it is to just watch a porn star at work.

In any case, it's not like things are getting less sexual on the internet, live interaction with real people in the hopes of getting sex has just replaced giving up completely and resorting to watching porn instead.

Kids these days.

either way, we're looking for cheap women

filthyrichmond.blogspot.com

For some reason, I'm not sure this is a step up...