Heard this all before. I wonder which group of high-priced lawyers who want to become even wealthier on the backs of lawsuits against mobile phone makers and operators are responsible for sponsoring this particular piece of "research"?
It's obvious mobiles fry the brain, always has been obvious
I smoke, not much but I do smoke.

When I initially started, it took a bit of an effort to get over what I suppose you could call my body naturally balking at the practice.

However, if I developed something like a cough for example, or felt it was causing me pain, then I wouldn't do it.
The fact is - it's not sore, and it has a lot of benefits that are pleasurable.

With mobiles it's a very different story. On first use, they hurt my head, and on every subsequent use they hurt my head - very painfully. Even being near someone else using a phone also is extremely painful for me. I never get headaches otherwise and have no history or occurances of such pains.

So, when I had a mobile I only used it if I had to.

I find the whole thing very odd, either few people are actually able to feel what is happening to them during useage, or there's some big cover-up in the media not to report on what people actually say.

Given some things others have said to me, and that everywhere you go someone is using a phone, I think it's that they just don't care what it is doing to them.

ie - they hate life to the extent that they don't care / 'you have to die of something'.

Bleak.

It's not as if the whole technology needs scrapped - for instance you could have a reciever antenna on the roof for internet links, and have shielding on the underside area, and the cable just comes in at the router / modem - and it'd only need to be on and focusing the wireless connection during your being online - so the rest of the time it's not even linked.

It's dangerous / painful etc mostly because there's a connection between send and recieve, and the beam (the wireless signal) is passing through (is focusing near) your body.

Someone should do a test of brainwaves under different baseline / control circumstances, then compare it to brainwaves while using the different mobile signals & devices.

kindda make you wonder if the same risk of damage holds true for wireless headsets. That's been in use for longer, so there may be more data to research with.
so, if this is correct, it will make the youth of today both brain damaged and non disciplined at the same time.

LOVELY

Why aren't we allowed to live in blissful ignorance anymore?
Heard this all before. I wonder which group of high-priced lawyers who want to become even wealthier on the backs of lawsuits against mobile phone makers and operators are responsible for sponsoring this particular piece of "research"?
I smoke, not much but I do smoke.

When I initially started, it took a bit of an effort to get over what I suppose you could call my body naturally balking at the practice.

However, if I developed something like a cough for example, or felt it was causing me pain, then I wouldn't do it.
The fact is - it's not sore, and it has a lot of benefits that are pleasurable.

With mobiles it's a very different story. On first use, they hurt my head, and on every subsequent use they hurt my head - very painfully. Even being near someone else using a phone also is extremely painful for me. I never get headaches otherwise and have no history or occurances of such pains.

So, when I had a mobile I only used it if I had to.

I find the whole thing very odd, either few people are actually able to feel what is happening to them during useage, or there's some big cover-up in the media not to report on what people actually say.

Given some things others have said to me, and that everywhere you go someone is using a phone, I think it's that they just don't care what it is doing to them.

ie - they hate life to the extent that they don't care / 'you have to die of something'.

Bleak.

It's not as if the whole technology needs scrapped - for instance you could have a reciever antenna on the roof for internet links, and have shielding on the underside area, and the cable just comes in at the router / modem - and it'd only need to be on and focusing the wireless connection during your being online - so the rest of the time it's not even linked.

It's dangerous / painful etc mostly because there's a connection between send and recieve, and the beam (the wireless signal) is passing through (is focusing near) your body.

Someone should do a test of brainwaves under different baseline / control circumstances, then compare it to brainwaves while using the different mobile signals & devices.

kindda make you wonder if the same risk of damage holds true for wireless headsets. That's been in use for longer, so there may be more data to research with.